**连词+分词短语一定是个伴随状语。** if allowed to remove.... 修饰后面的句子
it is allowed 这里是形式主语，问题在于，不能说一件事被允许，只能是人被允许。

AE区别：left 和bring不是平行关系，而是修饰关系
根据意思，five eagles left这个动作发生以后，才能导致成功抚养长大的鸟类数量达到了34只。left直接造成bring，因此两个动词具有逻辑修饰关系，不应该是平行关系

C, when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突。

A：介词短语in its spending its entire life cycle在本选项中做a species of midge is unlike any other known insect的状语。这在语意上是不正确的
D：状语从句就近修饰一个动词，这里就是known。because是连词，只能连接两个句子。本选项中其连接的两个句子是a Japanese zoologist has found a species of midge unlike any insect known和it spends its entire life cycle in the snow and ice of a glacier
E：spending是伴随状语，主语与为修饰的那句话的主语，就成了any other insect

little of + 不可数名词，few +可数

比较的是增长的%, 用less而不是lower; than + 主语 + 宾语+ 比较的时间段

对语义的理解

unlike前后对比的东西要属性一致

错选C, 只想到前后一致，忽略了语义。

“if从句用一般现在时，主句需用将来时，不能用could。”
“虚拟语气中的if从句不能用would”
“ it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet是完整的不缺少任何成分的完整句（定语从句中必然缺少某个成分）”

题目都错了，你们还分析的头头是道呢？？？

注意B中的growing，不管是主句的主语，还是whale均可以发出，这样会造成歧义。

the problem isn't pronoun ambiguity; it's that the meaning generated by that pronoun is nonsense.
it's impossible for one company to be two companies; the sentence must say that one company is going to be broken into two companies (or that two companies are going to be created from one company, etc.)

In ABD, "so" is used as a coordinating conjunction, joining two independent clauses. However, the second half of the sentence is clearly dependent on the first half, so a conjunction of this type is inappropriate.
As for E, there is a problem with the word "be", but the more obvious problem is that it sounds like Japan is the world's largest telephone company..

Only supermarkets distributing more than a certain number of grocery bags each month would be subject to the proposed tax.-总量还是会减少，只是没有减少那么多而已，因此还是成立的

题目问的是bidding firm， 不是the firm for which they bid

哦买噶原来是放4个橘子中间呀，我以为四个橘子排一排，上面放一个橘子，还在想这是要干嘛。。。。。。晕死

A选项，SVO+doing，doing是可以修饰前面整个SVO的，所以不存在因为逻辑主语是ancestor导致错误的说法（eg：I am falling in love with a grirl, making my mom happy. 我妈对我爱上一个女孩这件事儿高兴，而不是我让我妈高兴了 ）。（这点跟老师的解析不同)。A不那么准确的地方可能在于：相对于，人们经历event，从而导致人口数量下，而言，某个事件本身让人口数量下降更加Make sense。

making things even more difficult和if not paralysis都是修饰inactivity的。