unlike要求比较对象一致，while不需要

E--> Now, this genuinely does give an alternate explanation. It's not that low-wage workers will do this work. Management will do this work --- management is most certainly not low wage! Also, sales staff will do the work. In most corporate settings, sales staff is paid quite well, whereas data-entry are the lowest of the low.

B：when a prepositional phrase follows a comma, as does '...from the intentional discarding' here, yes, it functions as an adverbial modifier. therefore, the modifier in question modifies the action of the preceding clause (have become more and more littered).

B --> Even if there is no MAN in the in that specific demographic group, 10% WOMEN are employed i.e. 10% of that population is employed. And, if any MAN is added to that group, the rate will be more than 10%. Sufficient.

这题好厉害

漏看了【连续】整数

（2）的意思不是多1又二分之一倍，就是加减关系

prediction为什么要加s？

C选项我觉得还存在问题。你频繁去麻醉的犀牛并不知道是re的还是正常的犀牛。那如果按照平均数量来算的话大家都增长了，那还是应该re的犀牛比正常犀牛用量多一点啊。。无法去麻醉。
个人认为塔题目可能是说要recollar有没有副作用。。当然这是脑洞。。真相只能问GMAC

10^1 有兩位數
10^2有三位數
所以10^50有51位數
10^50-74後共有50位數
所以會是99......926
共有48個9再加2跟6

We have a few key things to focus on here:

1. In despite of / In spite of / Despite (Idioms)
2. into / to (Idioms)
3. how each option ends (Meaning; Construction) --> A/B 选项中suggests that there may be some farm households moved outside of Japan, which isn't what we're talking about - we're talking about people moving from rural to urban areas within Japan.

C--> Programs underwritten and conducted? Again, it makes more sense to write that the study was conducted. We can ditch (C).

最后一个句子不太对吧……

However, studies show thata disproportionately large number of the scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their field at an older age than is usual. 但是研究显示了一个不成比例地数量的科学家，这些科学家在一个比通常更大的年纪进入他们领域，在40岁以后产出了高度创造性的成果。

1.学法语的人16/0.04=400,但是判断不出来到底是400大还是至少100大
2.设学法语和学日语的人有A，则学法语的人有A*0.04，学日语的人有A*0.1，则学法语的人肯定比学日语的人少

求你不要再提约束力这3个字了，我头要炸了。

for anybody who wants to know the answer, --- by Ron

probably the easiest way to go here is to remember this as an idiomatic usage of the construction "known to". if the action is in the present, then you use "known to VERB"; if the action is in the past, then you use "known to have VERBed". as far as i know, these are the only two possible forms.

哇后面有个and,把前面的动词并列了啊...所以用原型,不过不认得ward导致我直接忽视掉了这个词..

D--> Whether Suriland's wheat is sold to near or distant countries is immaterial to the argument; note that the conclusion includes the qualification less any additional transportation costs.
E --> This indicates that Suriland wheat farmers might sometimes lose money on their wheat if selling on the world market. This does not indicate that they would not lose less on the world wheat market than they would selling to the government.

A patient subjectively claims to have had heart attack.
A doctor cites objective test result to dismiss the claim.

City resident subjectively claims that the billboard is too bright.
Spokesperson cites objective report to dismiss the claim.

Kayla's objection: Plan will backfire as people don’t like to pay fee. They will drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.

We need to counter Kayla's objection. Correct answer must establish that plan will not backfire i.e. it must indicate that people will continue to shop at the neighborhood despite being charged parking fee.