没有简·奥斯汀们和勃朗特姐妹们 都是复数 要用were 不能用was 因为

c：the correct answer handles the situation by linking two different verbs——in two different tenses——with "and". No modifier.

e：The main sentence says that Japan's population IS shrinking. I.e., it's discussing something that is happening at present.
A projected decline is in the future. So, "with a projected decline" can't be used as a modifier, since the future doesn't describe the present.
With+n：介词短语作状语，表示随着、带着，e选项：日本的人口伴随着一个预计的下降，正在更快得缩小❌

question the notion that customer loyalty program are beneficial; the passage gives a lot of counterexamples which suggest that the program is not as beneficial as companies and advocates think

错选E：“定语从句that won the Nobel Prize for Literature应改为不定式短语to win the Nobel Prize for Literature，这点考查了不定式和从句的区别，用之于本题，“变成第一位女性和第一位瑞士作家”会直接影响“赢得诺贝尔奖”这一事件的发生与否，因此应该用不定式短语。”
turn away from... to ...不是turn away from...and...
要注意细小词汇的转换！！！

idiom: not so much X as Y
In A, D, and E “…not so much X but Y…” is not idiomatic.
Always use "like" as a preposition, never as a subordinating conjunction.
EXAMPLES:
错误：My face felt like it had been set on fire.
正确：My face felt as if it had been set on fire.

可能是workshop而不是 是一个可能的workshop 碎片和完整的雕塑应该是并列关系而不是including
前面语义的理解有很大关系

The use 不能 like electromagnetic waves
这句话的意思是重力波不和别的东西反应（which修饰的是重力波不是use），用like的意思是不和e波反应，用in balabala意思是是用这个e波的话e波会和别的东西反应
like 离 matter 太近了，产生 matter like electromagnetic waves的歧义
原文表达的是以什么方式 而不是像
it is hoped 表客观，ETS prefer
hopefully 表主观，GMAT中一般为错误选项
hopefully meaning "i hope that/let's hope that". This is an informal expression, and is generally avoided in writing.

contrary to：考点，强对比，取非：McKay's team has demonstrated that the concentration of PAH's increases as one looks deeper into ALH84001, contrary to what one would expect from terrestrial contamination.

”if the deal were中的if可以理解为in case(that)，身后接虚拟语气，虚拟条件句不一定非要虚拟主句才能使用（if the deal were这个用法其实也和if any类似，作为独立成分出现在句中）“
错选C，them指代investors，但句意不通

词汇量少了：fungi 是fungus的复数

错选B：“who plan on practicing in socioeconomically deprived areas是定语从句，修饰other graduates，其使得主干的结构变为：
minority graduates are nearly four times more likely than other graduates
这句话只讲了少数毕业生比其它毕业生有更大的可能性，但是可能去干什么呢？没有写明，所以本句是错误的，不能说“人”比“人”更可能，只能说什么事情发生的可能性。“

错选A，看到as much as就想用！！完全忽略了D，E选项，这里that which怪怪的

“可以发现平行制造者and/as well as，其连接的两者需要在逻辑上和语形上保持一致”

错选B：没有顾忌到后面未划线部分：by pollution，by。。。，所以前面要有by
D：“一般现在时are reduced需改为现在完成时have reduced。一般现在时表示的是客观真理和事实，而显然这件事并非“真理”，仅仅是到现在为止的情况。”
主谓一致原则

没有看到 unqualifying 和 unqualified在A，C的不同！！！！
unqualified=unlimited
unqualifying: 不合格的

错选B，逻辑有问题！！！！以为是researchers发出的动作，不会去帮jay换实物！！
treat判断正确：后面是定语，不能要it

错选E，把contact想成verb了，“directly是副词，只能修饰动词have或者介词短语with an ichana (dream) experience等非名词成分，但在逻辑上，其应修饰名词contact，即，直接的接触。”
due to用错，“due to通常用来表示原因而不是方法。”

错选D：“本选项的错误是现在分词短语burning down individual trees和denude事件不平行”

错选B, 以为是定语从句简化，time is needed when workers are producing steel. 但逻辑说不通：时间被需要，当他们生产钢的时候
答案D：（time）宾补：（that ）workers needed to produce steel.