简单题,明确it指代的应该是hypothesis就可以了,错误选项基本上都是weakness
what引导主语从句时,
官方答案是说,modifier要尽量靠近修饰的词,那这里, family legneds最近的表达方式只有E了。。。。
未划线部分是一个被动形式的伴随状语,其逻辑主语和主句主语保持一致。从逻辑上来说,只能是object(东西)被viewed,不能是speed(速度)被viewed
differentiate A from B,
by far是“至今”的意思
"As ___ NOUN as" is only allowed if ___ = "much", "many", "few", or "little".
C选项:under provisions of the new maritime code修饰语放错地方了,似乎是在修饰area, 其应该被置于句首避免歧义;
D. 并不在于接两个完整句子,and 后面有thereby,所以可以是一个subject, 但是因此就有问题,引用官方解析如下:
问题是问反驳,什么反驳呢:a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection。
注意到底是什么阻止肌肉发展!!!!
结论:水里的药对健康没影响
This says that garbage containing lot of paper and cardboard burns away some dioxins. So possibly, garbage containing less paper and cardboard will not burn hot enough and hence all dioxins will get released in the air. It does compare current situation of dioxin levels with possible levels after regulation. We don't know whether the lower amount of paper will make up for releasing all dioxins but it certainly makes us doubt our conclusion. It questions our conclusion.
C: 其他广告商不会认为,k由于和竞争对手联系在一起而减少值得投放广告的吸引力。
A such spiders as ,spiders such as都可以。
A;animals inhabited deserts= deserts are inhabited by animals; each和it搭配
A previous was/ now is; line with lead的是discus不是discus的weight。line,排列/铺陈;line A with B,用B铺陈/排列在A上
关于插入语的逗号问题,Ron是这样说:
a)because连词,连接完整两个句子,身前无完整句子,错
考代词指代核心名词的问题:the weakness of the hypothesis核心名词是weakness,A/B的it指代的是hypothesis,没有D里的hypothesis做独立名词,被it指代好
C,plausible做伴随状语,逻辑主语是weakness,错误
E,which把主语weakness和谓语is隔开了,有逻辑关系的两个部分应该离得近可能近。