idiom: not so much X as Y
In A, D, and E “…not so much X but Y…” is not idiomatic.

intact 完整的和fragment碎片化的应该是并列的关系用and
the possible site of a workshop就对了

Always use "like" as a preposition, never as a subordinating conjunction.
EXAMPLES:
错误：My face felt like it had been set on fire.
正确：My face felt as if it had been set on fire.

Always use "like" as a preposition, never as a subordinating conjunction.
EXAMPLES:
错误：My face felt like it had been set on fire.
正确：My face felt as if it had been set on fire.

C项 Japan's farm households are still nearly 5 million
it seems to indicate that there are 5 million people on farms in Japan rather than that the number of farm households in Japan is 5 million. Also, nearly 5 million farm households are still in Japan is stated confusingly; the idea is not that the farm households are leaving Japan itself, but rather that people are leaving rural areas.

idiom: there were no X's or Y's.
(A) were no Jane Austens or Brontë sisters ("were" works with both items because they're both plural)
(C) was not Jane Austen nor the Brontë sisters (singular "was" doesn't work with plural "sisters")
We can eliminate options C, D, & E because they use a singular verb with the plural Brontë sisters.
There were no Xs or Ys = CORRECT
There were not Xs or Ys = INCORRECT

that指的是amount of pollutant

题干翻译：在发行平装本之前，已售出36，000本小说的精装本。 从第一本平装本销售到小说最后一本销售，平装本的销量是精装本的9倍。
这里是在说，在销售期间的平装是精装的9倍。不要想复杂（因为这两个条件是逗号隔开的），不要考虑那36000的影响。另外，计算正确

设hardback为X，paperback为Y
X + Y = 441000 - 36000 = 405000
9X = Y
Y = 364500

1200-800+400（加回S流出的400）-550（减去流入的550）=250（PS）
P是1200， 流入P点的是800和S，流入S的是550和R，但是S还要流出400。
这是个纯加法题！看懂题目

这里的倍数只是单单表示个数之间的关系，而非考虑个数后总价之间的关系。不要想复杂。实际四月，五月，六月的比例是 X : Y : Z = 2 : 3 : 4
1.16=（2*1.26+3*1.2+4*1.08）/9

a的their不是那么清楚，但其他更不能选了

CD差异：

正确句子翻译：朱塞佩·阿莱西（Giuseppe Alessi）是一位世界级的厨师，他的生活一直在寻求佛罗伦萨美食的正宗和美味，他是一位博学多才的学者，他从中世纪和文艺复兴时期的手稿中挖掘出许多食谱，并且是一位诗人和哲学家 他的灵感来自伊特鲁里亚陵墓田园诗般的壁画。

这里我们可以首先确认，三个身份（学者，诗人，哲学家）是不冲突的，因此转折不对，因此D不对
这里可以用as well as，应该是因为即使降一个等级也没有关系。

A的前后不对称，一个是doing一个是人
B 的both and不对称
E的从句的主语代词被省略的，导致两个谓语动词

这里than的比较对象明显是individuals of one genetic composition，那么考虑of前面的复数的情况的话，只有D是正确的。其实不是那么好判断of后面应该放单数还是复数，但是可以判断of前应该用复数

整句意思为：正如查尔斯·达尔文（Charles Darwin）所观察到的，只要具有一个遗传组成的个体比另一个具有更好的遗传能力，自然选择就会起作用

A除了which以外还有一个问题，while表转折只能对比同时间spontaneous的状态
C would would重复，almost修饰solely应该放在前面

since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulated should the fish there disappear
这句话没读懂干扰做题，说的是should虚拟假设这些地方原有的鱼没了，还有新鱼来repopulate
注意题干occasional failure指的是low stray，要在low stray那两句找答案

这个解析值得看n遍！

每个病人门诊时间更长，但医生觉得还是不够。
因为不仅新政策要求医生慎重做选择，而且选择内容越来越多了。
我本来觉得the companies' requirements now prevent them from spending enough time with patients表述牵强，并不是新政本身prevent医生花时间，而是增加的选择和新政两个因素让医生不得不花时间
但注意这只是most physicians believe ，是医生的主观感觉

约束力是如何体现的？强和弱有何区别？

it要做形式主语也只能说it took sb some time／money to do sth，也不知道是必须有sb还是必须有to do sth还是都要有

没有看到时间的变化，members的变化，以现在推测过去