A.&E-This choice lack parallelism and is unidiomatic (more for X rather than for Y is incorrect). The correct comparison is more for X than for Y.
B&D.-By eliminating the "for" prior to "the dollar bill," This choice creates an ambiguity: Is the dollar coin being used more as a substitute for four quarter than for the dollar bill, or is the dollar coin being used more than the dollar bill as a substitute for four quarters?

make it possible for something to do

此句是修饰cost，用more / less； 如果是numbers 用higher / lower。 动词rose， 用 did。

本来选的c，但是这里的意思是不是including指的就成蛋了？

Aim to do 和aim at 都可以，本题先通过Prevent杀掉DE, prevent sth or prevent sb from doing sth
D：destroying an elderly patient变成了修饰的内容，原句的意思是防止illness destroy 老人，这里只是防止illness，这个illness会destroy老人

PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class.即 PZ1000在its class 自己的这个种类中是最安全的。
由此推出conclusion：PZ 1000是当今世界最安全的。
削弱：pz1000所在的种类的车 发生事故的可能性比其他种类的车更大

同系列的车的比较，和， 和其他系列车的比较，比较范围不一样

想要通过半价促进销售，削弱的话就说明这个办法是不可行的，半价并不能促进销售，我可以比你的半价更低
注意方案题！

the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.文段中有提到新开的店可以出租video，所以不能拿这个削弱

主动语态下约束力较弱，而被动语态下约束力较强。

常见的看法类动词包括：know, assume, acknowledge, think, believe.

基本都是在考句意呢

provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants说明是只针对一小部分的sector

没有别的好方法，老实列出来总结吧。

The non-referent "it" doesn't have to appear strictly at the beginning of a sentence, but it must be followed by a clause that clarifies it.
"imitations of designers and crafters" this would mean that someone was trying to copy/imitate these people (as opposed to copying/imitating the artifacts, which is clearly what the sentence is supposed to mean).

you can "inspire" people to do things.

• you can also "inspire" the processes carried out by those people (e.g., The low-carb diet craze has inspired the founding of hundreds of new restaurants and specialty food stores).

• you cannot, however, "inspire" an inanimate object.

假设现在是x，则一年以前是x/1.2，1年以前拿掉了600 （x/1.2-600)*1.2=(1-0.12)x

这题纯考计算，逼了狗了。。。第2个算出来一个n的二次议程，有解，但是两个解都

名词/ing 和不定式的区别 变化成分是宾补时 看谓语动词的约束能力

要表达那个意思的话我可能会说 I throw a ball from the basket to xx.

mergering看成emerging了 我佛了

the distinction between pheromones and odorants - chemicals that are consciously detected as odors-can be blurry,注意这里有两个破折号，解释的对象是谁要明确了。 区别变得模糊了，后者又是detected consciously ，然后这些研究人员索性将其归为一类，那么顺延推理，这两者都是一样的perceived consciously