问的是一定错的
is provided by 指的是 导致effect on the bottom line 的原因,而不是让我们找这个不好的影响指的是什么。
原文:Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
开展价格促销活动是有成本的,否则公司会开展更多价格促销活动。
看哪个更与题目本身设计的逻辑链相关
错选C,C是说他们不管成本,也就是说不管价格是否升降他们都不会增加购买量,削弱结论;而B是说他们的质量是好的满足日本生产商,所以他们会加大购买量
选项C. B和C有好的营养元素,其他高糖高GI的食物也有好的营养,都是一样的好,但为什么不担心B和C?还是解释不了
文中说的是研究增多研发新药减少,利润增加,能够一次性解释这三个现象的因素:B中说的是由于药品目标研发的narrow和市场的扩大,导致了研究变多,刚好能解释这三个变化
M说如果PQ有交集,那么QR没交集;;S推翻说QR有交集,那就是说PQ无交集,所以选PQ没有交集的那一个,选B
k可以是2or5
公司有两种服务SD和FD,SD-low fee,FD-high fee,如果把FD转成SD利润下降,为啥?
A:revenue decrease>cost decrease
integer。。。害
"with" wrongly suggests that "some" refers not to the colonies themselves but to something that the colonies came with
"while" MUST be used with a clause or __ing phrase. it can't be used with a construction that doesn't contain any sort of verb form (such as this one, which is just noun + prepositional phrase).
果 strains没有不同
因 来自火星的死了
CQ:他因 本来都是全部(all)来自火星
comma + "including"...
...elaborates on a NOUN that comes before it (possibly a noun + modifiers);
AND
...is followed by only SOME, NOT ALL, of what that noun encompasses.
some of which 和including
by contrast, choice (c) is a-ok on this point. this choice also contains "...than they have been (__________)", where the parallel concept, "(more) conservative", actually appears elsewhere in the sentence.
this kills choice (b). that choice ends with "...than they have been", which omits a participle: in other words, it's actually "...than they have been ______", where the ______ is clearly seen to be setting (dividends). since the EXACT WORD setting doesn't appear anywhere else in this sentence, the sentence is incorrect.
whenever you use a parallel structure with omitted/elided words, the EXACT omitted word(s) MUST be present, IN PARALLEL STRUCTURE, elsewhere in the sentence. this means in exactly the same form - no alterations, no tense changes, no nothing.
campaign convince还是the organic food industry在in convincing而organise
这是that has convinced 和 in convincing的区别
rate of production哪里提高了?Annual Production不是后面下降了么
increase then decrease