选项A的 expected没有错误,可以理解为是和 said 平行的。但是后免得语义逻辑不对,应该是piracy的增加伴随着wider avaliable internet 而不是connection
["You are comparing actions, so you must use "just as."
Between D and E, D is not logically parallel. Remember, you are comparing the actions. You are comparing the increase in earth's rotation to the increase in speed of the skater. ]
"You are comparing actions, so you must use "just as."
Between D and E, D is not logically parallel. Remember, you are comparing the actions. You are comparing the increase in earth's rotation to the increase in speed of the skater.
Strongly Agree
c的解释看不懂
这个gap太牵强了吧。。。新图层轻,所以能载重更多,所以增加长期利益。。。额。。。
出口说的是总体,因为法规这些设备也会增加利润。。。。额。。。。
前面说了他们会掩盖差评所以作者对于这个评价保持怀疑态度
if unenthusiastic reviewers want their reviews being published,then they should give review kindly.所以从这句话能看出前面的这个系统没啥意义,就是一个负态度,负态度词只有两个,而stingy是mean的意思不切合题意,就选absurd
whereas too many reviews of books that readers will have trouble finding in stores would be inappropriate.是说很多书评让读者找不到适合自己的书评,所以读者希望的应该是在阅读过程中找到一些suitable的
Dismissive:鄙视的 Indifferent:中立的;Vindictive:怀恨的;Cautious:谨慎的;Ambivalent:模棱两可的。
signifying that the publishers will make special efforts to promote these books.就是对B的回答,A没有说prefer
打错了 早产儿=死+没死 是➕
早产儿=死=没死
没死👉失明 死👉不统计
失明早产儿比例🔝=没死失明/新生儿(1)
选项E:1⃣️没死增多 即 失明早产儿增多2⃣️(1)式分子变大
正如查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)所观察到的,只要有一个遗传组成的个体比另一个具有更好的繁殖能力,自然选择就会起作用。
请问D是怎么分析出来的,原文好像没有定位?
B. Correct. The passage tells us that the books that publishers heavily advertise will probably be among the books that most bookstores order in quantity. This provides a “yes” answer to the question.
啊 請忽略我的回答 貼錯地方了..
whereas too many reviews of books that readers will have trouble finding in stores would be inappropriate. have trouble in doing sth,书评太多读者找不到想要的--》说明读者经常去书评堆里找有用的书评
哥,这是E选项的定位
D/E需要分析选项间的细微差异,包括内容和语气两个角度,GMAC会搞两个看上去类似的选项挖坑
就近修饰,尽管是介宾修饰成分也不例外
这道题考查的应该就只是as as和equally的用法因为没有equally as一说,所以
排除ABC
D的asas中间不够平行
E如果不省略应该是 as drivers will be likely to exceed the proposed limit as drivers are likely to exceed the current limit
做题目的时候没看懂A中的scientisthope是一个插入的成分吧,导致不明白measurement可以被放在从句中的哪个位置,
对于解析说to do和for doing的做法不是很认同,,manhattan和og的解析中从来没有过类似的说法,但是说C是因为and将两个紧密联系的句子拆散了意思是有道理,ron
神的确说过,所以在有更好的选项A的时候不选c是理智的。
m和s之间的差距的解释有关于rate的,只要rate对m和s同等效果那么这个解释就不能成立了
By peggy卓 :Graders do not save or waste. They are just machines.