-Airport的结论是建立在怎样的基础上?
-居民完全有能力预知风险,他们应该自己负责机场噪音的影响。
B.如果是20年之前搬来的居民当然有资格投诉机场,因为在他们来的时候他们还没办法考虑这个因素
🐎
吸引眼球的衣服是销售方自己觉得会吸引客户的因素,因此,核心是客户是不是真的喜欢吸引眼球的衣服,是否真的会转化为购买。
d选项就提出了这个质疑,到底这个吸引眼球的衣服和常规的衣服比会不会吸引客户?
因为上了大学课程所以出狱以后的犯罪率降低了
这个应该是谬误回归吧
大学课程在前。出狱在后
assumption取非直接看是不是削弱
是因为本身的品格而不是大学课程
谬误回归第三条——他因存在
选C
目标:plans to improve employee productivity
即便只看这个,D也是最相关的
1、fatality死者 每公里死者变少--死亡率下降 和miles数无关,所以专注解释死亡率就好
C. The reasoning does not have to assume that cost is the sole factor. However, it clearly assumes that cost is an important factor. Nevertheless,
it does not make any assumption regarding what the relative importance of cost and other factors might be. For this reason, it neither assumes nor
implies what might happen in the case that cost is not a significant factor.
C. Paper manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe would prefer to use wood pulp produced in the United States if cost were not a factor.
For why D is wrong, it may be explained as: there is a certain number of fatalities per highway mile driven say 0.01. It doesn't matter how many miles were driven exactly. This only implies that if 100 miles were driven, there was one fatality. If 1000 miles were driven, there were 10 fatalities. If 10000 miles were driven, there were 100 fatalities. The fact that people have started driving more does not increase/reduce this number. (credit to gmatclub forum)
ing与名词之间的区别:前者表示“过程”,没有确切时间终止点;而名词表示一个可以有明确起终点的过程
result from 是由于,,导致的
result in。才是导致了,,,发生
这里因果反了
Nancy F. Gabin also acknowledges the pervasive male domination in the unions, N也同意F的意见,男人是主导地位,subordinate次级的
是同位语!
forces warm air to rise.
job怎么可以employ呢?
我晕 saving比cost少!
本文章内容引起强烈不适。。。snake is all over the place, too bloody scary 还考这么多道
真的!
思路:sam最后要胜出——当时桌面上至多有5根——刚才Rita在拿的时候桌面上要不多不少正好六根,才能保证Rita死活拿不完(可以试下如果7根,Rita就会只拿1根留6根给sam,所以这个游戏的目标就是留6根给对手,让自己稳赢。所以选项中找6的倍数,选D:12
厉害啊啊!
没错没错,谁面对剩6根,谁就会赢,但是16是怎么解……我还没想明白
在12根以下,Rita都可以通过第一局就给Sam只剩下6根,之后自己稳赢;但到了12根,Rita无法一次拿走6根,反而Sam能够通过第一局给Rita留下6根,所以Sam稳赢;12根以上,又不确定谁会面对6根了,双方都有可能赢
啊我说的第一条里,不是“谁面对6根”,应该是“谁给对方留下6根”,自己就稳赢
Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.