为什么不是归为类比题呢？
比较是cleaning equipment（A）好还是filter equipment（B） 好
好不好的标准是省钱
既然是类比题目。削弱评估等情况通常都是选择一个AB再次比较的选项
只有CE两个选项题到了cleaning和filtering 但是E选项并没有比较他俩 而是在比较plant排除
选择C
不用排除法的话，直接看选项C whether 是filtering的优势所以选c

E选项要展开的联想也太尼玛多了吧。。。
E 选项说的是狗狗相比那些虽然熟悉，但不在围墙内的狗狗，更愿意帮助那些熟悉但是在围墙内的狗狗

这题再回头过去看了一遍发现感觉又有了新的认识，不仅可以从语意来解题，还可以从语法来解
choice a,b: 主语是increase；choice d,e: 主语是usage。结合语意应该是increase造成负面影响，而不是usage造成负面影响
choice c, if条件状语从句，意思是“如果这些化肥使用增加，它们可以造成严重的环境后果。”不应该是假设状语从句，并且if和whereas同时作为状语修饰主句 they can create serious environmental problems，两个状语之间应该要有连词。
另外choice d,e还有一个语法错误，while状语从句前面应该要有一个连词。而在choice a,b中就出现了这个连词and
such as & like的区别：such as往往用于举例集合里的元素，I like fruit such as grapes and apples. like用于两个平级的名词，Like my brother, I ride a bicycle to school everyday.

Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

-Airport的结论是建立在怎样的基础上？
-居民完全有能力预知风险，他们应该自己负责机场噪音的影响。
B.如果是20年之前搬来的居民当然有资格投诉机场，因为在他们来的时候他们还没办法考虑这个因素

🐎
吸引眼球的衣服是销售方自己觉得会吸引客户的因素，因此，核心是客户是不是真的喜欢吸引眼球的衣服，是否真的会转化为购买。
d选项就提出了这个质疑，到底这个吸引眼球的衣服和常规的衣服比会不会吸引客户？

因为上了大学课程所以出狱以后的犯罪率降低了
这个应该是谬误回归吧
大学课程在前。出狱在后
assumption取非直接看是不是削弱
是因为本身的品格而不是大学课程
谬误回归第三条——他因存在
选C

目标：plans to improve employee productivity
即便只看这个，D也是最相关的

1、fatality死者 每公里死者变少--死亡率下降 和miles数无关，所以专注解释死亡率就好

C. The reasoning does not have to assume that cost is the sole factor. However, it clearly assumes that cost is an important factor. Nevertheless,
it does not make any assumption regarding what the relative importance of cost and other factors might be. For this reason, it neither assumes nor
implies what might happen in the case that cost is not a significant factor.

C. Paper manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe would prefer to use wood pulp produced in the United States if cost were not a factor.

For why D is wrong, it may be explained as: there is a certain number of fatalities per highway mile driven say 0.01. It doesn't matter how many miles were driven exactly. This only implies that if 100 miles were driven, there was one fatality. If 1000 miles were driven, there were 10 fatalities. If 10000 miles were driven, there were 100 fatalities. The fact that people have started driving more does not increase/reduce this number. (credit to gmatclub forum)

ing与名词之间的区别：前者表示“过程”，没有确切时间终止点；而名词表示一个可以有明确起终点的过程

result from 是由于，，导致的
result in。才是导致了，，，发生
这里因果反了

Nancy F. Gabin also acknowledges the pervasive male domination in the unions, N也同意F的意见，男人是主导地位，subordinate次级的

是同位语！

forces warm air to rise.

job怎么可以employ呢？

我晕 saving比cost少！

本文章内容引起强烈不适。。。snake is all over the place, too bloody scary 还考这么多道