为了增加居民存款，政府决定推出免税的special saving鼓励存款。Special saving program 收到了很多存款，说明政府计划有效（增加存款）。
要选出使计划不成功的一项->存款不增加
A. irrelevant
B. irrelevant
C. irrelevant
D. 公民转移存款，总存款并没有增加。
一定要清楚这个arguement/plan的目标和方法分别是什么，以及他们之间的关系，从而可以主动推理。
"the increase in X" means that X itself has increased. therefore, "the increase in the previous year" doesn't make sense, because the implication would be that the previous year itself had increased (what would that possibly mean?).
"the increase of TIME PERIOD", by contrast, means exactly what it should mean in this particular instance.
E. the number是不可数名词，所以至少应该改为much;
double as much as the increase of需改为double the increase of。这是因为，当“非数字物体（即，这个名词本身没有纯粹的数字概念，例如dogs、cats等绝大多数名词）”比较时，我们通常会用double(twice) as much as或double(twice) as many as，例如：
twice as many dogs
double as much water
但是，当“数字”比较时，我们不能加as many或as much，例如：
twice the increase
double the decrease
显然地，增长和下降本身就是数字的概念。因此，不能用double as much as the increase of;
"laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves. if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic;1. laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct 2.laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect ) 3. laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)
这道题为何不是D？
(2) The total number of bulbs in the first box is 9 more than the total number of bulbs in the second box.
第一个盒子的灯泡总数 是 9 + 第二个盒子的灯泡数，这明显可以求的呀？
in general, "so [adj/adverb] that [complete sentence]" is used when "[complete sentence]" has a DIFFERENT SUBJECT than the original sentence.
e.g., When I came back from vacation, I was so tan that my friends didn't even recognize me.
(subject changes from "i" to "my friends")
if the subject is still the same, then "so [adj] as to [verb]" is a more efficient way to write the construction.
扫描二维码，直接登录
A this只能指代名词不能指代事件B it错误同A
C had been时态错误
E birds无法prompting