错选A。 注意结论说those fears are groundless, fear 的是oil pipline 会重新污染湖水，而不是周围新的工业发展

not until 1955 was it hypothesized

This would imply that once maximum tunneling time is reached, tunneling speed will increase without limit as barrier thickness increases.

1、second同位前面整个句子，前面已经说了向日葵是主要的商业作物，后面不用再讲这个第二指的是重要性上排第二
2、only second还是second only to soybeans？只排第二表示原本要排第一的，现在只排了第二，句子没有这个意思。排第二只在大豆的后面，only强调只在大豆这一个东西的后面。

错选D。D根本没提到budworm这个事！！首先排除无关选项 ，不要被前面一个人的论证迷惑，问题是要反驳第二个人的论证。 D 只能说明 这种鸟数量减少有可能是因为 A原因，而不能反驳B原因！

E: argue一件事情的时候，常指反对该事情

B：The first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves as grounds for the ecologist's rejection of a certain position.
第一个部分是基于第二个证据基础上的证据，作用是去支持Ecologists对于argument的反驳。

b, 解释为什么重新聚合，因为移动速度＞逃逸速度。而没有说逃逸速度是多少。

Justify就是作者想要证明这个argument是正确的的态度

Conversely, most small asteroids should be monolithic, because impact fragments easily escape their feeble gravity.

转速要快 打错

If asteroids are rubble piles, however, the tail representing the very fast rotators would be missing,because any loose aggregate spinning faster than once every few hours(depending on the asteroid’s bulk density) would fly apart

转速低于几小时一次，必须是rubble piles

D为什么无关

吸引眼球的衣服是销售方自己觉得会吸引客户的因素，a选项对应的是另外一家公司也觉得这个会吸引客户，但是两者都没有触及核心问题，就是客户是不是真的喜欢吸引眼球的衣服，d选项就提出了这个质疑，到底这个吸引眼球的衣服和常规的衣服比会不会吸引客户？

gap：中风是不是一定会影响到大脑中控制语言能力的中心？？如果不影响的话也就无法知道 语言能力在哪边了

这道题选项表述有误，曼哈顿上的正确选项是：There are mice that are unable to form antibodies in response to herpes infections,
and these mice survive these infections without ever developing keratitis.

what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women's achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their "oppositional voices."
谨慎乐观的评价→虽然有成就，但也有反抗，但这种反抗是有局限性的

Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of "female experience" in any general sense.

B的观点：文艺复兴时期男女平等→被学者反复引用，作为反面教材（即他们认为不是男女平等）

both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.