c,
* "Amount" is incorrect. Because rhinos can be counted, it needs to be "number" instead.
* "Population" already represents the number of rhinos. So, if "population" is there, the use of "number" or "amount" is redundant.

neurogenesis, 神经形成
a, neurogenesis include brain, 逻辑不对
b,neurogenesis include mice .. or canaries 逻辑不对
c, neurogenesis inlcude mice's brain.., or canaries' neurons that increase when they learn.. → canaries neurons learn 逻辑不对
d, canaries neurons learn 逻辑不对

A错在哪里啦？

on the canal

B是迷惑选项， the speed with which impact fragments reassemble说的是这些fragments整合的速度，而escape voracity说的不是整合速度。

c, resembled 是分词, 不能和前面related to(过去时态动词)平行, 除非改为' resembling'

可以说转的特快的几乎都是小行星，但是不可以说几乎所有小行星都转特快，所以D，E错的

which → dollar, 逻辑错误

c, scale of: 'scale of 1 to 10 ' is right. But 'scale of .. structures' doesn't make sense.
each that: The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built ..., each that ...
each后面不跟that, 定语从句直接跟在名词后面xxx that... , 否则句子只有each一个名词做主语
d, 'scale of' , and前后不一致
e, 'scale of' , The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale ..., each had been connected by a complex regional system of roads. 两个句子之间无连词

a, The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built (on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,) were connected by a complex regional system of roads. 双谓语无连词
b,correct

in cooking, (noun) is used (passive voice construction); in medicinal usage, (noun) are taken (passive voice construction).

被引用的频率没有变，说明对专利权的支持在前后也没有变

E：because of a change in the underlying population of cases brought to trial. 只是说population变化，没说提高还是降低

结构：
1. 学者认为专利相关案件败诉率高，是因为法官“反专利”
2.1836年后败诉率降低，以及真正原因-------1936年法案改变，增强审查过程，专利更加符合专利法

错选C。 这个K没有错误理解文艺复兴时期女作家的作品，只是错误的用女作家代表了全部女性：
本文结构：
1.先提出两个理论，然后说现在趋势是反对both
2.开始具体描述这个反对的趋势
而K的例子出现在第二段，当然是反对最开始的两个理论啦----D

因为social的观点是tech是manager用来control workers，而tech的观点是反驳social的观点，所以tech不是用来控制workers，而是对整个商业的助益。

social理论对tech理论是误解的，如果social理论没有流行的话，最可能的结果肯定是积极的，减少对tech的误解的，---B
D也是积极的，但是本文并没有讨论business在社会中的角色，而是讨论tech还是social对商业的影响

问的是social constructivists怎么理解的tech determinism。第三段专门说的他们的误解，第三段最后一句说他们认为tech是独立于社会，但是可以直接影响工作，即A。

本篇讲的是这个人提供了solidcontribution 驳斥social constructionism，支持tech determinism。而A项是在说对科技发展的态度积极，无关。
结构：
1.intro：这个人对tech和social的辩论作出贡献。
2. support tech 理论
3.驳斥social理论。
4.继续驳斥social理论。

consider A as B，把A看作是B，如：These workers are considered (as) a high-risk group. 这些工人被视为属高风险人群。

时间状语，用when或in which