说的有点儿啰嗦了,逻辑链就是, 1找一个选项支持会继续堵塞-----2影响堵塞的因素是来往飞机架次-----3影响来往架次的是要换机的这些人----4这些人不变架次就不会改变太多。 为什么这些人不会变,因为这是中转站,一直就是这个常态。 考的思想就是,影响一个事件的核心因素会不会变,至于分流这些次要因素不许要考虑。
implication 影响,作用
most flights 架次里都有客人要换飞机去别的地方,那来的飞机次数不会改变太多。 这些人又要飞去别的地方,这是之前的常态,所以去别的地方的架次也不会改变太多。 建立一个新机场,当然会分流客人了,把这个城市当目的地的人,又或者当始发站去别的地方的人, 但是这跟题没一毛钱关系。 这两者的旅客占一半数量又怎么样。 来的和走的飞机次数没怎么变。 因为人家本来就把g当作中转站,它的角色就是一种常态,这种常态没有改变,飞机次数就不会改变,人家服务对象,主要就是为中转客户服务, 至于把这里当作目的地,或者始发地的人,你可以走,大不了以前装100个你走了装80个而已,但是飞机的常态架次不会变。 所以这道题不需要想那么多,作为中转站,影响飞机架次的是那么要中转的客人,他们不变,数量就不会变。
interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose
看到if没有反应过来是虚拟语气,排除了。。。
50>20+20
the biggest problem with D is its poor idiomatic construction. you don't say 'it is X times MORE likely that A will happen, RATHER THAN B'; 'more' is supposed to go with 'THAN', and is incompatible with 'rather than'. the proper construction would be 'it is X times more likely that A will happen than that B will happen.' better than either of these, though, is the more compact form: 'A is X times more likely to happen than is B.'
epidemic was merely an ancillary factor contributing to a general agrarian crisis stemming primarily from the inevitable decay of European feudalism. In arguing that this decline of feudalism was economically determined,
个位数为6+6+6=18 个位是8
为什么觉得d不太对呢...即使考虑了最后一段最后的点,warranted难道没有说得太重了吗?不是最后还是在说may吗,也都没有确定下来啊,我就选了a,因为觉得整篇文章到最后也没能够给这个caution进行justify,更何况这个人那个时代了,求指正哪里思考有误~
请问大家far less 和 much less在这里有区别吗?
do the job in 2 hours----=2h 而不是
想问问a项produce宾语是啥啊,为什么感觉找不到宾语
in accordance with 用于正式的表达(规定或法律条款)
句子理解:
An additional difficulty is that it is not obvious what criteria one should use to distinguish small firms from large ones.
长难句练习:
句子理解:draw sth off,将……抽出,排掉;draw sth away,将……抽走;draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity,将顾客从他们附近的餐厅吸引走
d, charged within the city limits
考点判断错误:一看not only误以为考not only用法,没考虑到考查的是not only和but also以及单独的but also的语意区别