这道题的关键是在讲CIB是否应该存在（是否是弊大于利）
A选项：奶酪的生产问题，未提到CBI 无关❌
B选项：CIB是否降低运营成本，就算降低了，也不能说明利大于弊，无法判断其是否应该存在❌
C选项：CIB是否会威慑低质量奶酪的进口 说明CIB有存在的必要✅
DE选项：均与CIB存在的价值无关❌

这道题说的是，实践中发现fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly，所以follow-up x-rays 是没用的。但此处的疑问就是，真的是所有的fractures that had initially been judged stable 都长好了、再没出现过异常情况吗？
C答案直译就是“在不同医院工作的医生的病人都X光都被review过了”正是在fix题干中的这个weakness，意思是说，“fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly”是在总结了许多医院的不同的医生的病例后下的结论，从统计意义上讲是有代表性的，所以确实是没有必要再开X光的。

E：如果政府补助多了，孩子给的钱就少了。用来生活的钱的总量是一定的，所以没有过得更好

看到and， parallelism , 名词短语和句子不能平行。

非因非果加强！！

我选之前就在E和C之间犹豫，一开始没有选E是因为觉得do more distance objects，就觉得加了一个Do去连接more很奇怪

先考虑goal是什么即可解题

有没有讲解，解答下

两种情况

分母分母。

忘记25了

就怕别人说“众所周知”，我问遍周围的人，没人知道

D：each employee... prohibit them..

1. and表示并列，但这里不是并列关系
2. have dated 时态不对
3. ，。。。。

While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model. A possible explanation for this inconsistency。。。。。。。Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for：文中提到有问题的不是model本身，而是第二段开头提到的studies+文章的第二段确实对这个模型提出了质疑，但是这个质疑的目的是作者的让步，为的是提出可能的解释。

Locate to " once it was underway rather than to have initiated it".
I didn't really understand the meaning of this phrase, but it means exactly what D talks about.

A怎么不行 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊

这个定语部分的核心词为consumers（having the power是现在分词短语，做consumers的定语）。在逻辑上，一个简单的主题应该是一件事，即，消费者有改变的权力，而不是消费者本身（一定是消费者做了什么事为主题，没有消费者的主题）。因此，这个介词短语应改为一个同位语从句

choice (e) inadvertently states that "the rate of people" is consuming fatty foods. that doesn't make any sense.
everyone laughed at me accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> WRONG. sorry. this sentence would actually mean that everyone laughed at me as they were walking into the girls' bathroom.
everyone laughed at my accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> CORRECT

大哥们读问题啊，这是演绎推理。哪里来的加强，果因推理啊