A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicated in its eastward orientation and by its overall plan, as well as artifacts, such as glass oil-lamp fragments, found at the site.
A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicated in its eastward orientation and by its overall plan, as well as
A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, once probably being a church, was indicated by its eastward orientation, overall plan, and
Indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church were its eastward orientation and overall plan, but also the
A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicates its eastward orientation and overall plan, as well as the
That a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church is indicated by its eastward orientation and overall plan, as well as by the
题目分析:
本题的句式比较散,需要考生细心找到整个句子的谓语动词。
选项分析:
A选项:in its eastward orientation和by its overall plan不平行,两者身前的介词应该均用by。由于这是一个被动语态的句子,所以只有用by才能表示出它们是indicate的逻辑主语。被动语态规定,只有by后才是动作的逻辑主语,例如:
(1) Lunch was eaten by me
(2) **Lunch was eaten in me
句(1)表示,“我”是吃午饭的发出者;句(2)则完全没有此意。
B选项:was indicated的主语A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, once probably being a church,的核心词有误,本选项中其核心词为a ruined structure。但在逻辑上,被计划和朝向表明的应该是“一个已毁坏的结构是一座教堂”这个事件,而不是“一个已毁坏的结构本身”。
C选项:本选项的主语是一个动名词短语,即,indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church,这个主语虽然长,但是是单数名词,谓语动词应该也用单数的was,而不是were。
D选项:indicates应该用被动语态,而不是主动语态。这是因为,“一个已毁坏的结构是一座教堂”这个事件肯定是“被”计划和朝向表明的,而不是主动表明了什么。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在逻辑和语法上均是正确的。That a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church是 主语从句。
C的解释不对,C是倒装句,正确语序为Its eastward orientation and overall plan, but also the artifacts, such as glass-oil lamp fragments, found at the site were indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church.
1. 单独使用but also不对 2.were indicating时态不恰当
误人子弟
我推荐大家多去看看国外论坛的分析,一般都比国内的老师分析的到位
C的解释不对,C是倒装句,正确语序为Its eastward orientation and overall plan, but also the artifacts, such as glass-oil lamp fragments, found at the site were indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church.
1. 单独使用but also不对 2.were indicating时态不恰当
同觉得C是倒装,were没有问题,是but also用的不对
对啊 were能有什么问题
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
澄清两个误区(出自Ron):
1. require 还有一个用法就是require+noun.
2. laws后面没有什么必须不必须加to do一说的,是这样的,如果laws后面加-ing,那么-ing指的是laws的具体内容;加to do,则是表laws的终极目的。
例:laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers.--对,因为-ing说的就是这个laws的内容是什么
laws to discourage drunk driving--对,因为to discourage..就是颁布这个laws的目的。
同理,plan这类词也是这样
B中谓语动词indicate的是一件事情,而不是一个结构,根据句意分析。题意为:这个结构是教堂这件事情可以被……表明
That ( x is y) is indicated by sth.
别看解释
indicate指明的应该是(这个ruined structure曾经是一个教堂),而不是指明了(ruined structure)
被indicated应该是人们猜测这个建筑是个教堂这件事,C的结构不完整,所以只能是E
被这三个东西indicated的应该是一件事情,而不是一个烂掉的结构(A ruined structure)
排除AB
C主谓不一致,动名词应该是单数
D逗号后面as作为连词,连接两个句子,主语不能省略(只有and,but,or可以省略)。所以这里缺少主语
E选项对
表明的是”structure可能是church“的这件事,这个事实
as indicates’; we must either say ‘as indicated by ’ or simply say ‘as it indicates’ – Per se, this is a fragment
A平行错,B核心词有误,C主谓不一致,D时态+主谓不一致
标点不是最主要的考点,不要一上来就看标点
B:indicated的修饰对象应该是church。
D:indicate应该是被动语态。
as well as 平行。
应该是事件被确认,而不是这个东西
A的and前后不平行
C的主谓不一致
D是根据句意排除
intended meaning:
1.ruined structure was probably a church
2.indicated by several things
A选项:in its eastward orientation和by its overall plan不平行,两者身前的介词应该均用by。由于这是一个被动语态的句子,所以只有用by才能表示出它们是indicate的逻辑主语。被动语态规定,只有by后才是动作的逻辑主语,例如:
(1) Lunch was eaten by me
(2) **Lunch was eaten in me
句(1)表示,“我”是吃午饭的发出者;句(2)则完全没有此意。
C选项:本选项的主语是一个动名词短语,即,indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church,这个主语虽然长,但是是单数名词,谓语动词应该也用单数的was,而不是were。
D,as是从属连词,不是并列连词,省略主语时,要接to to/doing/done作伴随状语,而不能直接接动词
E,by A and B, as well as by C.将A和B视同一个整体,=by A, as well as by B.
第二次看...怎么感觉D应该是错在indicates了,如果看成as XXX indicate的方式状语从句不是也能解释得通的吗,只是XXX太长滞后了?