抽象性名词做同位语时，要求抽象性名词既可以概括主句内容，题目前半句描述的是一个事实， 可以用finding/phenomenon/fact等词来概括，但用suggestion概括，语义不恰当。
james voiced the idea of going out for pizza, a suggestion that was well received by his hungry friends. 这里主句的内容就可以用suggestion来概括。

毕佬，D选项宾从后面的谓语是不是打错了？flowing ice不应该是不可数名词吗？后面的have是不是应该为has？最开始就排除了D，求解。

一个自然现象不能是suggestion，用phenomenon可以。
A do B， doing C，如果觉得是A do B 这整个事情在doing C，那其实就是A 在do C。

look like 的 这件事情 并不等于suggestion！

B的问题在前句是个事实现象，并不是一个suggestion

if you're going to use "a suggestion..." as an appositive modifier, then the portion being modified must LITERALLY describe something that is "a suggestion". it's not good enough to describe some neutral fact that might suggest something to an intelligent observer; it must be a literal suggestion.

for instance: james voiced the idea of going out for pizza, a suggestion that was well received by his hungry friends. --> note that this is actually a literal suggestion.

If I write My blood glucose level is low, suggesting that I should eat, it's incorrect to use "a suggestion". A blood glucose level can suggest something, but the level itself is not a suggestion.

B的问题在前句是个事实现象，并不是一个suggestion，记得看语义啊哥！

The features of … look just like those (指代features) at…, suggesting…. 前半句描述一个发现或者事实，后半句可以使用伴随状语、同位语等用法，说明该发现或事实的影响、 意义。此句使用的为伴随状语，如果要使用同位语，则为，The features of … look just like those (指 代features) at…, a finding/phenomenon/fact that suggests….

D中feature是suggesting的逻辑主语。但是我觉得feature来进行拟人不是特别好。而B中的 ，+n. 可以来概括前面的整个句子，起到和suggesting一样的作用。。。即使feature可以进行拟人来做出suggest的动作，为什么B是不正确的？