The effect of the earthquake that caused most of Port Royal to sink into the Caribbean was like the eruption that buried ancient Pompeii: in each case a slice of civilization was instantly frozen in time.
The effect of the earthquake that caused most of Port Royal to sink into the Caribbean was
As the result of an earthquake, most of Port Royal sank into the Caribbean; the effect was
In its effects, the sinking of most of Port Royal into the Caribbean was the result of an earthquake
The earthquake that caused most of Port Royal to sink into the Caribbean was, in its effects,
Most of Port Royal sank into the Caribbean because of an earthquake, the effect of which was
比較對象判斷錯誤
和the eruption对比的只能是the earthquake
地震像火山喷发 对比对象注意 如果是A或者E 应该是the effect of which like the effect of eruption
和the eruption对比的只能是the earthquake
比较对象错误的问题排除ABE,剩下CD,C in its effect, the sinking....原意想表达的是the effect of earthquake,而不是the sinking, 指代错误,C错,选D
A:effect was like eruption句意错误
A:effect was like eruption句意错误
B:同A
C:it指代不了所有格形式的earthquake,而且也不平行
D:结构对称,句意清晰
E:effect was like eruption句意错误
请问大家in its effects这个短语的位置应该怎么确定,谢谢
错误原因不在位置,在于its的指代
错误原因不在位置,在于its的指代
应该还是先看比较对象的问题,sinking 和 eruption比较
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
sc,简单题
考察:
比较对等;未画线部分
未画线部分后面:like the eruption that ;比较的是名词,前面也应该是名词,最好是that 结构; d The earthquake that cause
the earthquake (A event)is like eruption (B event); the effect is not like the eruption
A: 比较effect 和eruption
B:同上
C: its指代错误 sinking和eruption比较
D:很平行
E:比较对象错误
XXX
实际上是比较对象问题,而不是XX cause earthquake的错误,因为caused作为一个从句明显是修饰Earchquake的。
先要理解句意,才能明白怎么解题:地震造成了Port Royal沉入了加勒比海(这件事的)影响,就像是火山喷发掩埋了Pompeii的影响一样:每个案例(发生后)文明都被冻结了一段时间。
所以要么比较两种自然灾害,要么比较两种现象的影响;
所以只有D符合要求
比较对象要相同,earthquake和eruption
the effect didn’t cause Port Royal to sink . Earthquake did.
the earthquake itself is what should be compared to the eruption.