扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-SC-72
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period
that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing
that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
题目分析：
本题虽然属于难题，但是考点较为容易识别，属于常考题型。
选项分析：
A选项：虽然suffer和from是固定搭配，但是本选项中from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。试想，只有供给变坏，才能导致受灾，而食物供给本身是中性的，不会导致生物受灾。另外，动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period需改为名词短语an increase in sea surface temperatures during the same period，这点考查了名词和动名词的区别，用之于本题，increase这个动作的时间已经被状语 during the same period规定了发生时间段，因此increase必然有时间终止点。
B选项：Correct.本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。
C选项：because of身后的核心词为food supplies，本选项错误同(A)。动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period错误同(A)。
D选项：reveal的宾语 creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling的核心词为creatures of the seabed，一个对食物供给的研究应该揭示的是海床生物的某种情况而不是单纯的一个生物。
E选项：本选项错误同(D)；动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period错误同(A)。
possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。
A creatures were suffering是因为increasing temperatures.
B creatures were suffering是因为food supplies were dwindling , dwingling 的原因是increase in temperatures
动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period需改为名词短语an increase in sea surface temperatures during the same period，这点考查了名词和动名词的区别：
名词和动名词的最大区别在于强调结果还是强调过程。动名词强调这个事件的过程，而纯名词强调这个事件的结果
(1) Studying Chinese is hard. (2) **The study of Chinese is hard
(3)**Studying Chinese enables me to work in China. (4) The study of Chinese enables me to work in China.
经常考的： 动名词 和句子。 通常表示xxx 变化 或者xxx 怎么样， 正确答案都是句子 而不是 名词。
状语要修饰离自己最近的那个动词，导致逻辑语意不同：
A creatures were suffering是因为increasing temperatures. (possibly a result from increasing是creatures of the seabed were suffering的状语。)
B creatures were suffering是因为food supplies were dwindling , dwingling 的原因是increase in temperatures (possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。)
A. a result 作为同位语修饰句子：were suffering...
B. as a result 作为状语修饰前面动词dwindling
根据语义，应该是说食物供给减少的原因
"从句意看，研究应该是reveal一件事，而不是一个noun，排除DE
原因应该是温度增加，而不是增加的温度，排除AC"
个人总结
经常考的： 动名词 和句子。 通常表示xxx 变化 或者xxx 怎么样， 正确答案都是句子 而不是 名词。
错选A，
逻辑语意没get到。
A creatures were suffering是因为increasing temperatures.
B creatures were suffering是因为food supplies were dwindling , dwingling 的原因是increase in temperatures
状语要修饰离自己最近的那个动词！！！！
到底是因为东西而发生某个动作/带来某个结果，还是因为东西做了某事而带来某个某种影响/结果：
food supplies were dwindling的主干是dwindling，因为（食物供应）下降而受苦，是（温度）增加的结果，逻辑正确
dwindling food supplies的主干是supplies， increasing sea surface temperatures主干是temperatures。因为supplies而受苦；是温度的结果，逻辑都不对，应该是因为食物供应下降而受苦；是温度增加的结果
温度上升→食物供给变坏→生物受灾
而不是温度上升→生物受灾
a,b
Choice A: creatures are suffering from food supplies
Choice C: creatures are suffering because of food supplies X
Choice D/E: reveal creatures X
DE可以先排除，然后C是因为，which结构是nonessential的理论上对主句不会造成影响可以去掉，但是实际上去掉了整个句子就不对了。
至于AB是因为increse 比increasing好点？v.>adj.>n.>v+ing ？
m
d。。creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
缺少动词都不是一个句子
想哭，GMAC就像一个步履蹒跚的老头，走起来特别慢，只能从A到B，不能从A到C，更别提到G！
A选项 VS B选项
三件事情：A-生物在经受食物短缺；B-食物短缺了；C-海面温度上升，逻辑：因为海面温度上升，所以食物短缺，因为食物短缺，所以食物在经历这个短缺。
A选项：a result from increasing是独立主格，修饰主句生物在经受食物短缺，C-A，错！
B选项：food supplies were dwindling as a result of an increase in temperature，C-B，对！
, possibly resulting from an increase in和, possibly as a result of an increase in一样都可以做状语吗，
如果把B后面换成，resulting还对吗，
不能判断状语修饰的谓语，revealed，were suffering，were dwindling，因为如果修饰revealed明显错误
感谢楼下各位精彩的解答~~~
A选项，from dwindling food supplies是介宾短语，作状语修饰suffer这个动作，"possibly a result ..."是同位语，修饰creatures were suffering这句话, 状语和同位语修饰的是同一个对象，意思是“海平面温度升高”导致“海底生物遭殃”；
B选项，because food supplies were dwindling是原因状语，修饰suffer这个动作，"possibly as a result of..."是介宾短语，作状语修饰food supplies were dwindling, 意思是“海平面温度升高”导致“食物短缺”导致“海底生物遭殃”。
A的逻辑链是不完整的。
C选项非限定性定语从句"which were..."使用错误。
赞！
赞赞赞！！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
说说自己感想。
实际上，（A）在suffering from+xxxx上，没有语义错误。因为dwindling的食物资源是海洋生物正在suffer的原因也很合理。再者，（A）的错误应该是：result from是只能用在动词结构。result做名词的时候，是没有result from的用法的。
所以剩下（B）和（C）在根据语义和核心词，可以排除C，选（B）。
（D）和（E）一般看到就知道可以say byebye
同意A选项的解答！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这题可以根据语义先排除DE，ABC如何选的话完全可以靠核心词来选，这句话中that creatures of the seabed were suffering from XXX, possibly a result from XXX的两个XXX就是我们要确认的核心词，显然根据语义来说第一个XXX应该是食物的波动，第二个XXX应该是增长，所以由此可以选出正确答案B
你为什么这么优秀？！！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论