Sunflowers growing in pots were placed, with their roots submerged, in the pond contaminated with radioactive elements. The sunflowers kept growing; in the process, they absorbed radioactive elements. Within twelve days, 85 percent of the radioactive elements were removed from the water, which is no less than can be accomplished with the much more expensive conventional filtration techniques. Scientists therefore propose using sunflowers for decontamination wherever there are radioactively contaminated ponds.
Which of the following, if true, points to a limitation on the applicability of the proposed method of decontamination?
Some plants other than sunflowers can also remove radioactive elements from water.
The water in many ponds contaminated with radioactive elements is so cold that it would kill sunflowers whose roots were submerged in it.
Sunflowers that grow with their roots submerged in water grow less well than sunflowers growing under optimal conditions on dry land.
Only species of sunflowers with large leaves can have their roots submerged in water and still keep growing.
In ponds in which the circulation of the water is artificially increased, sunflowers absorb radioactive elements far faster than they do in other ponds.
P太阳花放在污染的池塘里可以削弱污染
C用太阳花来削弱池塘污染。
方案类型的要涉及方案,B太阳花在池塘的冷水长不了。就是在说方案的可操作性。
削弱的方法
找出一个东西去削弱科学家的结论
D只是说了sunflower种类有限制,但是并没有指出有大叶子的很稀有之类的,没有起到限制的作用
我当时在B和D之间犹豫了很久 猜了B
想知道D错在哪里? 谢谢
Only species of sunflowers with large leaves can have their roots submerged in water and still keep growing.
推广大叶子的向日葵就能满足科学家的目标了嘛,向日葵的应用并没有受限。除非选项再补充条件,大叶子向日葵很稀有,很难存活啥的,这才会真正限制大叶子向日葵的应用
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
方案的可操作性
第二次对了。。
围绕CQ的三个点,B是方案的可操作性问题,E则啥也不是
错选D,犯了整体和部分的错误。
方案题。三种CQ。1.方案的可行性2.方案的可操作性3.方案的副作用
B说通常有辐射的水温很低会杀死这种花。说明否定了方案的可操作性。
题目问 limitation on the applicability of the proposed method ,首先A错 谈了其他方案, C、E错 和CQ无关,D only 限制了sunflowers的种类 ,但是不影响,只要有某种sunflower能达到目的就ok