Journalist: Every election year at this time the state government releases the financial disclosures that potential candidates must make in order to be eligible to run for office. Among those making the required financial disclosure this year is a prominent local businessman, Arnold Bergeron. There has often been talk in the past of Mr. Bergeron's running for governor, not least from Mr. Bergeron himself. This year it is likely he finally will, since those who have discounted the possibility of a Bergeron candidacy have always pointed to the necessity of making financial disclosure as the main obstacle to such a candidacy.
In the journalist's argument, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
The first provides information without which the argument lacks force; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.
The first provides information without which the argument lacks force; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is used to support a further conclusion.
The first describes a practice that the journalist seeks to defend; the second cites a likely consequence of this practice.
The first states evidence bearing against the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
Each provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that supports a further conclusion stated in the argument.
情景:略
推理:在这篇论证中,文章只有一个结论,是在第二个黑体字中的“it is likely he finally will”。而剩下的部分,我们都可以认为是前提。由此可知,第一个黑体字是前提,第二个黑体字是结论。前提的作用以及目的只有一个,即,支持结论。
选题方式:略
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 第一个黑体字给出了一个论证在之前缺乏的信息;第二个黑体字声明了文章的主结论。
B选项:第一个黑体字给出了一个论证在之前缺乏的信息;第二个黑体字给出了一个支持最后的结论的中间结论。第二个黑体字不是中间结论,而是最后的结论。
C选项:第一个黑体字给出了一个记者想要维护的一个实践;第二个黑体字给出了这个实践的结果。第一个黑体字并不是一个记者想要维护的实践,而是一个中性的信息。
D选项:第一个黑体字声明了一个反对论证主结论的证据;第二个黑体字是论证的主结论。第一个黑体字是论证最后结论的前提,并没有反对结论。
E选项: 每一个黑体字都给出了一个支持最后的结论的中间结论。两个黑体字的功能均不正确。
A 第一部分给出了信息,如果没这个信息,那么论证将不足。
第一个boldface给出了背景信息;
第二个boldface由conclusion+evidence组成:main conclusion就是he finally will,evidence就是following sentence,since...
第一个是一个客观事实的陈述,作为整段话的背景条件;第二个是整段话的结论
可是主结论只有“it is likely he finally will”,后面的since一长句话都是给出的原因呐,不能把它也归于结论吧?
全篇结构分析:第一个黑体字主要给出了一个大环境背景,说到每年的选举都需要做财产公开才有资格作为候选人,后面说道今年有AB这个商人也做了财产公开,之前总是听说他要竞选。第二个黑体字说今年推测他可能会成功,给出了原因(since)之前失败的主要屏障就是没做财产公开。两个黑体字很明确:第一个是一个客观事实的陈述,作为整段话的背景条件;第二个是整段话的结论