Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for home use, owners of stores that sell video games lobbied for protective legislation. Citing as a precedent legislation that postpones home film rentals until one year after general release to theaters, the video sellers proposed as an equitable solution a plan that would postpone rental of any video game until it had been available for sale for one year.
Which of the following, if true, would support an objection by owners of video rental stores that the fairness of the proposed legislation is not supported by the precedent cited?
Although the daily rental fee for home use of films is generally the same as that for video games, the average rental period for a video game is longer than that for a film.
Film rentals for home use tend to particularly strong during the first year after a film has been made available for both sale and rental at video rental stores.
Most people are interested in playing only the latest video games and tend to find video games that have been available for over a year unappealing whether they have played them before or not, whereas films maintain their appeal far longer after their release.
People who rent video games tend to play them by themselves, whereas people who rent films invite friends and neighbors to watch.
A slight decline in revenues from films that have been recently released in theaters has been attributed to the growing market for rentals of films for home use.
多么简单的一道类比推理。被我渣渣的阅读能力给代跑了。
看了800遍原来是sale和rent在竞争∠( ᐛ 」∠)_
film的法案和video game类比。找film 和video的不同点
类比推理
类比推理CQ-1两者的不相似之处
错因:没读懂问题
没有认真把题目读懂(词汇和理解),问题中的not supported by the precedent cited需要找到video game无法效仿电影租赁保护政策的原因。 lobbied for 游说
类比推理,直接找两个CQ。
尽管D项也是两者的不同点,但是这个不同点不能够说明为啥一年后再租电影可以,但是一年后租游戏不可以。既不能加强又不能削弱。C正确,D错误
lobbied for 游说
film的法案和video game类比。找film 和video的不同点
类比