Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.
Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?
The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats
Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida's coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population.
The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air
When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
问题的中心是船撞鱼导致鱼死亡,而不是船使得鱼的食物减少。所以此为无关项。按照原来的结论,即使船减速了还是照样撞鱼,但是B却说船减速了可以让鱼有更多的食物。就算鱼有更多的食物吧,又怎么样呢?能削弱“船减速不能减少撞鱼”的结论么?所以B只是说了一个客观事实,也许这个事实是真的,但是不能削弱结论。
第一遍模考做错了,忽略了推导出结论的时候所用的理由。这题削弱,是从结论的理由下手的,使得得出结论的理由不成立。
题目:因为船速越低,马达声就越低沉,manatee听不到低沉的声音,所以让船低速行驶只能让情况更糟。
E manatee压根就听不出船的马达声,题目结论基于的理由不能成立,题目结论不成立。
A 是给出了一个他因,说要求船低速行驶的区域是manatee生活的区域和以前发生过碰撞的区域,也是有一定的削弱作用的,但是没有E这样直接针对题目的论据出手。
E什么速度这种生物都听不清,所以谈不上降低了速度影响了听力会使得情况更坏,解释就不reasonable
断桥型削弱
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-343896-1-1.html 贴一个我觉得cd上不错的解释 因为字数限制 这里放不下去原答案
我做错了,(严格按照考场状态做);就我个人而言,排除ACD很容易,但是误选了B,当时认为B有助于保护栖息地;
老师,请问这题是因果推理还是方案推理呀?
个人觉得是因果推理~
这道题求解释
什么速度这种生物都听不清,所以谈不上降低了速度影响了听力会使得情况更坏,因为以前也辨别不出来。非要找出推理方式个人觉得是因果推理,答案E断了因果关系
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E说生物无法分辨声音,岂不是加强了“减速没有用这个结论”?