A company’s personnel director surveyed employees about their satisfaction with the company’s system for awarding employee performance ratings. The survey data indicated that employees who received high ratings were very satisfied with the system. The personnel director concluded from these data that the company’s best-performing employees liked the system.
The personnel director’s conclusion assumes which of the following?
No other performance rating system is as good as the current system.
The company's best-performing employees received high ratings.
Employees who received low ratings were dissatisfied with the system.
Employees who receive high ratings from a performance-rating system will like that system.
The company ’ s best-performing employees were motivated to perform well by the knowledge that they would receive performance ratings.
P: 高工资的人很满意
C: 绩效高的人很满意
gap: 绩效高的工资高
赞!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
【high ratings】 employees:satisfied with the system.
【best-performing】employees: liked the system
assumption搭桥:填补 【high ratings】和【best-performing】之间的gap
B:The company's 【best-performing】 employees received 【high ratings. 表现好,得分高。→系统好
取非削弱:表现好,得分低→系统不好
assumption 选出正确选项的方法是 正确选项取反会削弱文章结论
C并没有削弱conclusion conclusion是说表现好的人)对于企业的满意度高 但是C取反是说得分低对企业满意度也高 这个并没有削弱 premise 测试中得分高满意度高
真正削弱是B 表现好 得分低 证明得分高反而表现差 从premise 无法推结论 是削弱
简单直白地让人不敢选。。。。。。。。。
Core-the company's best-performing employees liked the system.
Premise- employees who received high ratings were very satisfied with the system
Pre-thinking- the argument jumps from employees who received high ratings to best-performers
B bridges the gap in the argument