Most farmers attempting to control slugs and snails turn to baited slug poison, or molluscicide, which usually consists of a bran pellet containing either methiocarb or metaldehyde. Both chemicals are neurotoxins that disrupt that part of the brain charged with making the mouth move in a coordinated fashion—the "central pattern generator"—as the slug feeds. Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose. Moreover, slugs are not the only consumers of these poisons: methiocarb may be toxic to a variety of species, including varieties of worms, carabid beetles, and fish.
Researchers are experimenting with an alternative compound based on aluminum, which may solve these problems, but this may well have a limited future as we learn more about the hazards of aluminum in the environment. For example, some researchers suggest that acid rain kills trees by mobilizing aluminum in the soil, while others have noted that the human disease Alzheimer's is more prevalent in areas where levels of aluminum in the soil are high. With farmers losing as much as 20 percent of their crops to slugs and snails even after treatment with currently available molluscicides, there is considerable incentive for researchers to come up with better and environmentally safer solutions.
The passage suggests that methiocarb and metaldehyde would be more effective as slug poisons if it were true that they
disrupt the slug's digestive processes rather than its reproductive functions
reduce the slug's ability to taste food
begin to affect the feeding behavior of a slug only after it has ingested a lethal dose
reach the central pattern generator more quickly
accumulate only in the central pattern generator rather than throughout the brain
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
推断(Inference)
旨在考察我们对文章的深度理解,以及逻辑推断能力。
题目的意思其实让我们找出这两者的劣势,然后反过来就是答案了。定位在“Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose.”这两者的问题是鼻涕虫在吃到致命的剂量之前就被影响了饮食表现。所以,如果可以在致命剂量之后才影响饮食表现就可改进。
选项分析:
A选项:扰乱鼻涕虫的消化过程而不是繁殖功能。根据定位句可知,影响的是饮食表现而不是消化过程。
B选项:减少鼻涕虫的味觉能力。这个选项有一定的迷惑性。文中也没有提到过“味觉能力”。所以我们无法确认味觉是不是鼻涕虫不吃到致命剂量的原因。所以减少这样的能力不能确定是否会影响鼻涕虫吃到致命的剂量。
C选项:Correct. 只有达到了致命的剂量才开始影响鼻涕虫的饮食表现。考点中已经分析的很清楚了,此处不再赘述。
D选项:达到“central pattern generator”更快。这个选项说反了,如果更快的达到“central pattern generator”,鼻涕虫饮食表现受到的影响也就更快。
E选项:只在“central pattern generator”中累积而不是大脑中。不论在哪里累积,只要不能减缓影响饮食表现的时间,就无法让这两者的效果更大。
C 一开始想的是,虫子如果不进食了,不就达到目的了吗?你管他致不致命呢?
但农药的目的除了保护庄稼,还要杀虫(因为虫子可能还会繁殖)。
所以要保证虫子会死,且在这个过程中,它还降低对庄稼的破坏了,所以一定要lethal,再降低破坏
farmer的目的是杀死害虫,但是这两种药的缺点是还没达到致命剂量就无法进食了,虫子没法继续吃毒死去,无法有效达到farmer的目的。
定位在“Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose.”这两者的问题是鼻涕虫在吃到致命的剂量之前就被影响了饮食表现。所以,如果可以在致命剂量之后才影响饮食表现,就可改进。
C选项:Correct. 只有达到了致命的剂量才开始影响鼻涕虫的饮食表现。
错选D选项:达到“central pattern generator”更快。这个选项说反了,如果更快的达到“central pattern generator”,鼻涕虫饮食表现受到的影响也就更快。
key word: lethal dose致命剂量
interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose
会影响进食表现→还没有喝到致死量前就会停止进食
毒药影响了虫子的进食能力,some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose,这样这些虫子因为吃到的毒药不够多,就不会死了。
feeding进食
文中换一种说法最直白的答案,不要自己脑补多想
毒药影响了虫子的进食能力,some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose,这样这些虫子因为吃到的毒药不够多,就不会死了。
Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose.
增加了可能型就是一些snails会在达到一个致命剂量以前就停止进食
关键词while
原文Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs\' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose. 这句话说的是这两种化学物质的缺点,用while表转折,即它们虽然有点用,但是它们会干扰鼻涕虫吃和消化这个毒药的过程,导致它们【在吃到的量可以致死之前就不吃了】的可能性增加,也就是它们被这个化学物质控制的可能性减少,说明化学物质用处不很大。
---------------kmf
生单词影响了对文章的理解:lethal——致命的,由此可排除其他答案
没有到致命剂量,就开始影响,就没那么有效,虫子还能苟延残喘
呃,完全没看懂那句话。仔仔细细看了半天,就是说那两个含有的神经毒素干扰了虫子的脑子的一部分,而这部分就是负责进食表现的。也就是说,虫子吃吃吃,还没吃到能死的时候,就不吃了,因为脑子里那部分神经被抑制了,所以这种东西限制了他们对毒素的摄入。一边吃,一边脑子不让吃。所以这虫子就是死不了。
~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
注意此句中有while,表转折。即while句后面的部分,是ineffective的表现
对!!! 文中:达到致命剂量前,N已经起作用了,所以N while somewhat effective。所以要使其effective,必须使得N达到致命剂量时,才起作用。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论