This passage is excerpted from material published in 1997.
Is there a massive black hole at the center of our galaxy, the Milky Way? The evidence is inconclusive. Just as the Sun’s mass can be determined, given knowledge of other variables, by the velocity at which its planets orbit, the mass at the center of the Milky Way can be revealed by the velocities of stars and gas orbiting the galactic center. This dynamical evidence, based on recently confirmed assumptions about the stars’ velocities, argues for an extremely compact object with a mass two to three million times the mass of our Sun. Although according to current theory this makes the mass at the center of the galaxy too dense to be anything but a black hole, the relative lack of energy radiating from the galactic center presents a serious problem. A black hole’s gravity attracts surrounding matter, which swirls around the black hole, emitting some energy as it is engulfed. Scientists believe that the amount of energy that escapes the black hole should be about 10 percent of the matter’s rest energy (the energy equivalent of its mass according to the equation E=mc2). But when the energy coming from the galactic center is compared to widely held predictions based on how much matter should be falling into a theoretical central black hole, there is a discrepancy by a factor of a few thousand.
The “serious problem” referred to in line 17 could be solved if which of the following were true?
Current assumptions about how much matter a black hole would engulf proved to be several thousand times too high.
Current assumptions about how much matter a black hole would engulf proved to be a few thousand times too low.
The object at the center of the Milky Way turned out to be far more dense than it is currently estimated to be.
The object at the center of the Milky Way turned out to be far more massive than it is currently estimated to be.
Matter being engulfed by a black hole radiated far more energy than is currently assumed.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B。这是因为,在文章中提到,根据当前的理论,银河系中心的质量太过于密集,不可能是任何东西,而只能是一个黑洞。然而,当测量从银河中心发出的能量时,发现它与根据黑洞应该吞噬多少物质的广泛预测存在差异,这个差异是几千倍。这就是文章所说的“严重问题”。因此,如果有证据表明当前对黑洞应吞噬多少物质的假设是几千倍太低,问题就会得到解决,因此B选项是正确答案。
A选项,假设的量太高,说明实际黑洞吞没量是比假设低,自然也就释放比较少的能量了。
the relative lack of energy radiating from the galactic center presents a serious problem
这个although 很重要,表明不是跟黑洞本身的mass有关系,,而是rediation量导致的问题(解释不通的problem)。如果知道了 原来吸进去的没有那么多,就说得通了
这题感觉出题点在discrepancy这里吧..好像没有其他地方表明实际上释放的能量是多于理论值还是少于理论值
事实与假设相比---黑洞吃太少所以放太少。改进---实证表明假设的黑洞吃的量比实际高。
“But when the energy coming from the galactic center is compared to widely held predictions based on how much matter should be falling into a theoretical central black hole, there is a discrepancy by a factor of a few thousand.”说现在收到的energy比本应收到的少,A说现在假设的黑洞吃的太多,也就是说实际情况下黑洞吃的没这么多,吃的少那么放的能量就少,问题就没有了。
又读一遍发现现在的evidence是energy escaped 小于 10%乘the matter’s rest energy 等于 10%乘matters mass乘c2,注意是matter‘s的不是 centre object(就是那个疑似黑洞)的
又读一遍发现现在的evidence是E
现在的evidence是E小于mc2,所以如果证明m太大了,把m调小,可以使E等于mc2
现在的evidence是E