The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation's fuel supply problems.
on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying
on both diesel fuel and engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and they say
on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says
both on diesel fuel and engines has sparked the oil industry to a counterattack, saying
both on diesel fuel and diesel engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and it says
错选A:saying...作状语,发出saying这个动作的主语应该是主句的主语,变成了proposal,显然不合逻辑。简单题,不该错;排除点:平行和修饰
这道题最后AC中选择了A就是没有读懂这句话想表达的意思。并不认为A是错在proposal不可以say,而是错在intended meaning illogical
EPA的提案对柴油发动机和柴油进行限制,受到了oil industry 的反对,因为他们认为这样的move(即place restrictions)会恶化国内的supply
对!这句话的重心是放在后面oil industry的counterattack!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
句子的重心是proposal 所以是用has 太粗心了我
A错,saying的发出者是counterattack,反击。所以不能做伴随状语,否则会被以为是修饰proposal。
proposal不会saying
proposal不会saying
这道题最后AC中选择了A就是没有读懂这句话想表达的意思。并不认为A是错在proposal不可以say,而是错在intended meaning illogical
EPA的提案对柴油发动机和柴油进行限制,受到了oil industry 的反对,因为他们认为这样的move(即place restrictions)会恶化国内的supply
主语是proposal
proposal是主语,单数!
根据SV一致和both…and...平行触发语原则,排除了BDE
choice a, saying作为句末的结果/伴随状语往前修饰最近的动词has sparked,导致say的主语变成了proposal。语意错误,根据逻辑应该是oil industry发出了这个反对,并且oil industry说这个举动会恶化燃料提供的问题
考点: both......and ..... parallelism
SV agreement: proposal is subj, so we need use has instead of have
v.+ing modifier vs. which modifier: saying in choice A, showed us proposal is saying, illogical; which in choice C, refers to oil industry, 就近原则
choice a, saying作为句末的结果/伴随状语往前修饰最近的动词has sparked,导致say的主语变成了proposal。语意错误,根据逻辑应该是oil industry发出了这个反对,并且oil industry说这个举动会恶化燃料提供的问题
根据SV一致和both…and...平行触发语原则,排除了BDE
choice a, saying作为句末的结果/伴随状语往前修饰最近的动词has sparked,导致say的主语变成了proposal。语意错误,根据逻辑应该是oil industry发出了这个反对,并且oil industry说这个举动会恶化燃料提供的问题
proposal单数has
says的主语是oil industry
选c,这里which修饰的counterattack,他为什么可以跳跃过by部分去修饰counterattack?
因为
这就是which修饰noun+prep的情况,by短语修饰的counterattack,有直接联系,直接修饰,所以which可以直接修饰noun+prep
啊没理清逻辑关系。其实say的内容是反击内容,所以say主语是oil industry
好好看看啊!SVO,doing doing指S 不指O A指proposal 看清主语
又做错了。。这个主语真的不好看出来是谁,我以为是proposal。。。
可是oil industry都可以say,为什么proposal不能
指代的是counterattack吧
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
which says的which指代的是oil industry
exacerbate 使···恶化
counterattack怎么能say呢?但saying的主语是proposal,更不靠谱,只能选C,然而依旧觉得counterattack says很诡异