The federal immigration station on Ellis Island, which was first opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900, processing nearly three quarters of all immigrants entering the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century.
The federal immigration station on Ellis Island, which was first opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900, processing nearly three quarters of all immigrants entering the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century.
Having processed nearly three quarters of all immigrants who enter the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century, the federal immigration station on Ellis Island first opened in 1892 and then was rebuilt in 1900.
Processing nearly three quarters of all immigrants to enter the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century, the federal immigration station on Ellis Island first opened in 1892, being rebuilt in 1900.
First opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900, the federal immigration station on Ellis Island processed nearly three quarters of all immigrants entering the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century.
Of all immigrants to enter the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century, the federal immigration station on Ellis Island processed nearly three quarters of them, having first opened in 1892 and rebuilt in 1900.
A、which应该和被修饰的离得尽量近一些;句子成分残缺,无谓语
B、having processed体现先时性,但句子时空关系错误;此外,句子重心转换
C、 being rebuilt现在进行时,与in 1900 时间标志不相匹配
E、 having first opened同时性修饰不明
句意:先建造,再重构,才能process
又是非谓语的having done和谓语did的问题,非谓语的having done动作在谓语did动作之前发生,是明显的先时性表达,但句中20世纪第一季度的process明显发生在1900年重建之后,这是B项的最大问题;
虽然我答对了,但还是有个地方犹豫了很久:
First opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900 —— is it necessary to put an "and" to link the two phrases?
百度了一下,then是可以兼做连词的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A、which应该和被修饰的离得尽量近一些;句子成分残缺,无谓语
B、having processed体现先时性,但句子时空关系错误;此外,句子重心转换
C、 being rebuilt现在进行时,与in 1900 时间标志不相匹配
E、 having first opened同时性修饰不明
句意:先建造,再重构,才能process
A station rebuilt不是移民站自己重建
B station opened and was rebuilt不是移民站自己开
C station opened不是移民站自己开
E of all immigrants和后面的of them重复,station have opened and rebuilt
先开,再处理。
b最大的问题在于,having done/having been done要表示发生在主句动作之前的,然后你带入这题的语境,发现先process了3 quarters,然后才open,是不make sense的
关于一个事物的几个部分谁做句子主干、谁做修饰部分的问题:
大的、重要的,很可能是作者想实质表达的部分做句子主干,比如SVO里的任何一个成分,小的、不怎么改变的部分做修饰语(定语或状语)。
之于本题,一共有移民局在1892年成立、在1900年重建、处理了3/4的移民事务三件事,前两者是既定事实,不可改变的,是移民局这个物体的原生事项,做非限制定语指出移民局具有这样一个特征比较恰当,而且从影响力的角度来说,移民局到底是在1892年成立还是在1893年成立,对于读文章的人来说并不那么care;而处理了3/4的移民事务则是移民局取得的成果,并且在影响力方面,它是处理了3/4还是处理了4/4的移民事务对旁人的影响力是比较大的(比方说可以决定美国的人口是3亿还是4亿),所以如B/C将成立和重建时间作为句子主干,处理了3/4的移民事务作为伴随状语,修饰成立和重建这两个动作,逻辑上是不恰当的,D的结构则好得多。
First opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900是可以这样用的。。open和rebuild这里可以不使用被动态
错选B,主要是漏看了题目中的修饰,这个地方是在过去的某一个时间段接受移民...用现在完成时毫无根据
“First opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900”
伴随状语
记得og上有一道题的解析说句意要按照事情发生的顺序,对于此题,将发生时间排序就好了,只剩下了选项D
The federal immigration station on Ellis Island, which was first opened in 1892, then rebuilt in 1900, processing(没有谓语) nearly three quarters of all immigrants entering the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century.
有大神可以说一下open这个词可以用作被动语态吗..
同问~
是可以用作 be opened
两只狗的相遇....(头像)hh
那在这里加不加was都对吗?像A和B选项这样?
(hhh有点可爱
A选项仅仅就which was first opened in 1892 非限制性定于从句来说,是没错的,which可以跳跃修饰前面的federal immigration station,如果变成SVO结构,就是federal immigration station was first opened in 1892, was opened用作被动语态是没有问题。然后A的主要问题是没有谓语动词。
B选项我觉得那里用作opened是不对的,因为原句应该是想说它was opened,就跟后面的was rebuilt, 都是强调在某个具体的时间点被如何如何。而且平行更好看... 而且本选项的主要问题是逻辑意思不对,作者主要想表达的是federal immigration station processed....这件事,这个才是重点,应该当做主句。而was opened /was rebuilt都是仅仅是对federal immigration station的补充说明而已,并不重要。
讲得好清楚~明白啦,谢谢:)
b最大的问题在于,having done/having been done要表示发生在主句动作之前的,然后你带入这题的语境,发现先process了3 quarters,然后才open,是不make sense的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论