Consumer advocate: In our nation, food packages must list the number of calories per food serving. But most of the serving sizes used are misleadingly small and should be updated. The serving sizes were set decades ago, when our nation’s people typically ate smaller portions than they do today, and, as a result, people eating typical portions today consume more calories than the package labeling appears to indicate that they will. It is time package labeling reflected these changes.
Which of the following is the main point of the consumer advocate’s argument?
The number of calories per serving listed on most food packages in the consumer advocate’ s nation is misleadingly small.
Most serving sizes used on food packages in the consumer advocate’s nation should be increased to reflect today’s typical portion sizes.
People eating typical portions today often consume far more calories than the number of calories per serving listed on food packages in the consumer advocate’s nation.
The serving sizes used on food packages in the consumer advocate’s nation were set when people ate smaller portions on average than they do today.
The use of misleadingly small serving sizes on food packages in the consumer advocate’s nation probably leads many people to consume more calories than they otherwise would.
题目问advocate's argument是什么,这个人说了一大堆,他想说的是要改能量标签。大概意思是说,比如包装上从以前开始岛现在都是写的是100g的卡路里,但是现在人食量大了,每次吃的量是这个的数倍,使得人们常常错误地认为自己吃得没有实际的多。那advocate就说我们应该提高这个分量,比如改成200g或者300g什么的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论