扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-17
City resident: These new digital electronic billboards should be banned for light pollution since they are much too bright.
Outdoor advertising spokesperson: No, that’s not true. Testing with a sophisticated light meter shows that at night they throw off less light than traditional billboards that are reflectively lit.
Your mistaken perception that they are brighter comes from looking directly at the light source—the screen itself.
The underlying strategy of the spokesperson’s response to the resident is most analogous to the underlying strategy of which of the following?
A doctor dismisses a patient’s claim to have had a heart attack, citing a cardiac enzyme blood test.
A politician rejects an accusation of perjury by denying the credibility of witness testimony.
An insurance agent rejects a claim, on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence to support the claimant’s testimony.
An investigator casts doubt on the results of a lie detector, citing the subject’s report of illness during the test.
A psychologist treats a mental illness by encouraging a patient to abandon inconsistent beliefs.
cr
共同之处 Testing with以及citing a cardiac enzyme blood test.，重点都是test
怎么每个解答下面都能看到你胡说八道。。。不要误人子弟好吗。。上面那个sc里还说despite后面可以跟句子
hahahahaha
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A patient subjectively claims to have had heart attack.
A doctor cites objective test result to dismiss the claim.
City resident subjectively claims that the billboard is too bright.
Spokesperson cites objective report to dismiss the claim.
发言人是通过实际测量结果来驳斥市民的观点的。
A 医生通过血检报告来反驳病人的观点，类似
B 证词的可信度。市民并未提交证据，也没说市民说的太亮了不对，发言人还同意了市民的看法，说你有错觉是因为你是直视电子牌。
C 证据不足。
D 实验对象生病了，这是驳斥的采样对象的可靠性
E 劝病人放弃不一致的信仰。
通过用测光仪的测试结果来击碎路人的主观感觉，其实并没有那么亮啊。
A：医生通过科学的测试来说明反驳病人言论。
不得不说，Advanced的题目总有几个看了解析都十分懵逼的题目。。。
確實
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
十脸懵，那下面那个说他们觉得亮是因为直视光源，这句话是干啥用的？
通过用测光仪的测试结果来击碎路人的主观感觉，其实并没有那么亮啊。
A：医生通过科学的测试来说明反驳病人言论。
总结逻辑链：spokesperson认为居民的反应=主观感受，spokesperson使用两个board的测试结果（客观现实）与主观感受之间的不同来反驳
因此这个题需要找能反映主观感受和客观现实不匹配的情况
只有A能反映该情况
这个题需要你把逻辑链提炼一下然后找相似（类比）
其实考的就是理解能力
spokesman用客观事实证明not brighter去反驳resident主观性地直视灯源而下的主观性结论brighter。因此，我们要选的就是与spokesman类似的推理方法：用客观的事实反驳主观的判断！
市民觉得太亮费电，发言人，Testing with a sophisticated light meter用专业的测量过，不费电
A 医生说病人没病，用了血液检查（专业测量）
D 调查员怀疑测谎仪，用了病例的问题 （怀疑了专业仪器啊，啊啊啊啊 我看反了）
cite的都是测试结果，这个response说的不仅仅是后面的concept confusion，也是前面的测试结果，包括一整个回复，不要只看纯纯反驳的地方
What is the strategy of OAS? He counters the resident’s claim by citing a fact (meter reading) and by presenting an alternate reason (other than the reason that the new digital billboards are brighter) for the resident’s perception.
城市居民反对新的广告牌，太亮了，认为有光污染
广告商争辩说经过测试，在夜间，新广告牌比以前的广告牌散发的光少，只是看起来比较亮而已
A：医生引用一个测试结果，而说病人没有犯心脏病
没读懂题 题目是科学测试来证明 类比找测试 而非主观推论
A. Correct. This choice is the most closely analogous to the spokesperson's strategy: the doctor uses an objective test to show the factual claims of the patient to be false.
找关于小题大做的选项
通过用测光仪的测试结果来击碎路人的主观感觉，其实并没有那么亮啊。
构建场景，第一句就说了路人觉得新的广告牌比老的广告牌更亮。涉及到新老的对比。
cr
The underlying strategy of the spokesperson’s response to the resident，注意问的是潜在的回复策略跟哪个相似
The outdoor advertising spokesperson responds to the city resident by citing an objective test that shows the factual claims of the resident to be false.
The outdoor advertising spokesperson responds to the city resident by citing an objective test that shows the factual claims of the resident to be false.
underlying strategy 所以是方法，而不是有效性什么的之类
test and conclude.