扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-29
Kayla: Many people are reluctant to shop in our neighborhood because street parking is scarce. The city plans to address this by adding parking meters with time limits that ensure that parking spaces are generally available. But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, so most will probably drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection?
Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
The city could post signs with street parking time limits to ensure that parking spaces become available without forcing shoppers to pay at meters.
Currently, most shoppers in the neighborhood drive only occasionally to shop at malls in other neighborhoods.
The neighborhood already contains a parking lot where shoppers must pay to park.
The nearby malls with free parking have no parking time limits to help ensure that parking spaces in their lots become available.
We need to counter Kayla's objection. Correct answer must establish that plan will not backfire i.e. it must indicate that people will continue to shop at the neighborhood despite being charged parking fee.
E再一个就是跟这个方案根本没关系
方案题要包含方案，现在就是要肯定方案的可行性，而E在说一个客观的东西，并不是分析这个方案
也就是问：计划的支持者怎么去反驳那些反对他们的人
题目问支持plan的如何反驳K E直接否定了K的客观陈述部分 不选
提出一个新的方案，说这个新方案有效并不能证明老方案无效。
Kayla believes the plan will have the opposite effect since people dislike paying for parking and are likely to shop instead at a mall where parking is free.