扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-29
Kayla: Many people are reluctant to shop in our neighborhood because street parking is scarce. The city plans to address this by adding parking meters with time limits that ensure that parking spaces are generally available. But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, so most will probably drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection?
Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
The city could post signs with street parking time limits to ensure that parking spaces become available without forcing shoppers to pay at meters.
Currently, most shoppers in the neighborhood drive only occasionally to shop at malls in other neighborhoods.
The neighborhood already contains a parking lot where shoppers must pay to park.
The nearby malls with free parking have no parking time limits to help ensure that parking spaces in their lots become available.
Kayla's objection: Plan will backfire as people don’t like to pay fee. They will drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.
We need to counter Kayla's objection. Correct answer must establish that plan will not backfire i.e. it must indicate that people will continue to shop at the neighborhood despite being charged parking fee.
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal 【a proponent of the city’s plan could make】 to Kayla’s objection? = Which one of the answer responses provides the best rebuttal to Kayla's objection?
E这里谈others是没有用的，比较起A，所以还是要认真读完所有的选项，当时对A理解出现了问题
E再一个就是跟这个方案根本没关系
方案题要包含方案，现在就是要肯定方案的可行性，而E在说一个客观的东西，并不是分析这个方案
emmmm,对方案推理总是忘记选项要与方案有关....总是靠感觉做题.....
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal （a proponent of the city’s plan） could make to Kayla’s objection?- 如何反驳K ，支持City
Which of the following would be the most logically effective rebuttal to Kayla’s objection （that） a proponent of the city’s plan could make？
问题是问反驳，什么反驳呢：a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection。
也就是问：计划的支持者怎么去反驳那些反对他们的人
A 读反了
题目问支持plan的如何反驳K E直接否定了K的客观陈述部分 不选
提问的句子有点绕Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection? 一个城市计划的支持者能做出的针对K的拒绝的的最有效的反驳。非常绕，断句断不好就搞晕。意思就是以下哪个反驳了K的话；人民不喜欢停车计时，所以会不来购物。支持计划：增加parking meters确保足够停车空间。手段目的题，B选项是另一个方案，跟我们要讨论的方案无关。C无关选项卡，顾客到底多久来购物无关。D已经有一个需要交费的停车地方，讨论另一个地方无关。E附近免费的停车地方没有时间limites。无关。
这题的question stem 非常迷惑性，其实问的是support city‘s plan
原文说的是安装parking meter。"But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, "说明这个parking meter天然地是需要付费的。B 提出了一个新的方案，安装signs with street parking time limits意思是停到街上，而不是原方案里的parking meter里，并且停到街上不超时就不用付费。
提出一个新的方案，说这个新方案有效并不能证明老方案无效。
B项：This answer choice suggests a potential alternative to installing parking meters. This does not provide a rebuttal to Kayla's objection.
先理解好问句： Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal 【a proponent of the city’s plan could make】 to Kayla’s objection? = Which one of the answer responses provides the best rebuttal to Kayla's objection?
Kayla believes the plan will have the opposite effect since people dislike paying for parking and are likely to shop instead at a mall where parking is free.