Scientist: In an experiment, dogs had access to a handle they could pull to release food into a nearby enclosure that contained a familiar dog and nothing else, contained an unfamiliar dog and nothing else, or was empty. The dogs typically released more food to the familiar dog than to the unfamiliar dog. This suggests that dogs are more motivated to help other dogs they know than to help unfamiliar dogs.
The scientist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, in the experiment, the dogs with access to the handle tended to release more food when
the behavior was being encouraged by a familiar person than when it was being encouraged by an unfamiliar person
the enclosure was empty than when it contained an unfamiliar dog
An unfamiliar dog in the enclosure was displaying hostility toward them than when an unfamiliar dog in the enclosure appeared friendly
a dog in the enclosure appeared uninterested in food already released into the enclosure than when it appeared interested in that food
a familiar dog was in the enclosure than when a familiar dog was visible but the enclosure was empty
填空題,等於從上述往下推論要一致:狗會幫助狗朋友--->達到加強效果
A---> a familiar person/ an unfamiliar person 引入外來因子,如果成立,反而削弱原先推論
B--->反向削弱,沒狗朋友卻留更多,代表一開始認為狗會幫助朋友的立論有誤
C---> hostilit引入外來因子,如果成立,反而削弱原先推論
D--->appeared uninterested in food引入外來因子,如果成立,反而削弱原先推論
E--->合理,狗朋友在一起就幫助;沒在一起就無所謂
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论