扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-42
Although elementary school children have traditionally received considerable instruction in creating visual art, there has been no such instruction in music. Consequently, in contrast to the situation for visual art, most people as adults do not recognize the artistic intentions of composers. To remedy this situation, a few educators now recommend teaching elementary school students to compose music.
Which of the following, if true, is the strongest basis for arguing that implementation of the recommendation will not lead to the desired result?
Few elementary school students are likely to create superior compositions.
Traditional education facilitates the appreciation of visual art, but not the recognition of the artistic intentions of artists.
More people report that they enjoy music than report that they enjoy visual art.
Some composers have had little formal instruction in composition.
The recommendation is based on the results of a controlled longitudinal study conducted in three schools within a single city.
B项：This indicates that traditional education in visual art—including, presumably, such education for elementary school students—does not generally result in ability to recognize the artistic intentions of artists. By analogy, the recommended education in music composition would be unlikely to lead to a recognition of the artistic intentions of composers.
题型：目标管理
削弱方法：他因削弱/ 拆桥削弱 / 目标达不成goal，没有效果、不可行、有副作用（以目标为核心，结果为导向）
逻辑链：
Goal：recognize the【 artistic intentions 】of composers 要识别出作曲家背后的艺术意图
Plan：【teaching 】elementary school students to compose music 教小学生作曲
How削弱： 你教小学生作曲，他们也没办法识别出这个艺术灵感。
B最相关：
【Traditional education】 facilitates the appreciation of visual art, but “not”’ the recognition of the 【artistic intentions】 of artists.
传统教育促进了视觉艺术的欣赏，而不是识别出艺术家的艺术意图。
感觉更像方案推理。
P：为了拯救这种情况。
C：教育学家建议教小学生作曲。
B：削弱方向--方案不可行。传统教育无法促进recognition of the artistic intentions of artists.（根据原文，这里artists指composers）
题目没读懂
这一题的关键是 看是否能看出原文中可视艺术和作曲家的区别
传统：可视艺术instruction👉appreciation of可视艺术👉recognition balabala of 艺术家
新：音乐instruction👉appreciation of音乐👉recogintion balabala of作曲家
【B选项 割裂了“传统”中第二个“👉”，通过类比，我们知道“新”中第二个“👉”也不能成立，即达到不了 remedy this situation的目的（situation指的是前一句话：recognition balabala of作曲家⬇️or🈚️）】
这道题目首先在于能否看出most people as adults recognize the artistic intentions of composers because of elementary- level instruction in creating visual art. 传统方法和新方法的类比只是作者的一个assumption。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
D错在some，这个some到底是多少呢？如果是很少，那个别作曲家自己没受过指导也能作曲并不能说明什么。如果是全部作曲家自己都没接受过作曲训练，可以推出接受作曲训练并不一定能帮助理解作曲家的意图。
这题我虽然选对了，但是做的时候一直对e选项抱有疑惑，觉得它是想说数据太少所以不充分，但其实它并没有说数据少的事完全自己在脑补。。。有可能学生十分的多呢
数据少不代表会错啊，万一歪打正着猜对结论了，还是可以取得预期啊
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
引进艺术得不到预期效果
读懂题目含义就能做
in contrast to the situation for visual art，？？？？
这题绝了，从没想过类比题也能这么恶心...
B选项直接到像是在重复premise一样
E. This suggests that the recommendation is based on scientifically collected data. That does not suggest that the recommendation would fail to achieve its intended purpose.
B indicates that traditional education in visual art—including, presumably, such education for elementary school students—does not generally result in ability to recognize the artistic intentions of artists. By analogy, the recommended education in music composition would be unlikely to lead to a recognition of the artistic intentions of composers.