In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
① weaken+except
② US car accident +serious> EU, ∵ EU has diff safety belt ∴EU→US + severe car accident
A:欧洲人系安全带的可能性要高于美国人,提出他因,可以削弱,排除;
B:欧洲人接受了相关训练,美国人没有,提出他因,可以削弱,排除
C:欧洲的车比美国的车更坚固,提出他因,可以削弱,排除;
D:统计上美国人比欧洲人更容易发生车祸:更容易发生车祸≠更容易发生严重的车祸,看起来并不能削弱题目,保留
E:采用了欧洲安全带的州发现车祸的平均严重程度并没有下降→削弱因为安全带造成区别这个原因
综上,D
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论