扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-SC-18
The Rorschach test is gaining new respect as a diagnostic tool because it takes only one hour to expose behavior and thought processes that may be unlikely to emerge in other procedures or weeks of ordinary interviewing.
that may be unlikely to emerge in other procedures or weeks of ordinary interviewing
whose emergence is unlikely in other procedures or weeks of ordinary interviews
that might not emerge in other procedures or in weeks of ordinary interviews
that may not emerge under other procedures or weeks of ordinary interviews
likely not to emerge during weeks of ordinary interviewing or in other procedures
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
1) Tim's daughter may not go to the dance with the boy sporting the tattoo of Barry Manilow on his face.
Here, "may not" means "does not have permission." So, Tim's daughter has been forbidden to go to the dance with a weirdo, and Tim can rest easy.
2) Tim's daughter might not go to the dance with the boy sporting the tattoo of Barry Manilow on his face.
Now, "might not" means there's a possibility that something won't happen. So there's still a real chance that Tim's daughter will be attending the dance with a shady character.
For our GMAT example, it makes sense to write that there's a possibility that behavior and thought processes won't emerge; it doesn't really make sense to write that the behavior and thought processes have been forbidden to emerge. So "might not" is the more logical option.
that might not emerge in other procedures or in weeksof ordinary interviews
ll sentence “unlikely to emerge in X or in Y” is parallel and idiomatic
Although may and might are often interchangeable, this is not true of may not and might not. This is because may not can be interpreted to mean are not permitted to. This is of course not the intended meaning here; might not cannot be interpreted in this way, and so would be preferable.
might not emerge in other procedures or in weeks of ordinary interviews 表示在这个过程中，用in
在其他程序或每周日常采访中可能不会出现
A，may和unlikely重复，排除
B，whose引导process不当，排除
not permitted to. This is of course not the intended meaning here; might
not cannot be interpreted in this way, and so would be preferable.
如果没有in，变成The Rorschach test 和 其他的procedures or weeks of ordinary interviews（把procedures 和 weeks of interviews 看成同一类事物），类别上没有加上in更合理
关于may和might，网上有个看法不知道靠不靠谱：表现在和未来可能会发生的事情，两者都可用，但表达可能不会发生的情况，一般用might not而不用may not来避免歧义，因为may not 还有礼貌地表达许可的用法，如you may not go out now, it's too late.
b whose不能修饰process；emerge 动词形式>名词形式，后面or前后平行同上。
c correct
后面平行的解释：不加in 应该也可以吧，or 可以触发平行 整体上应该可以理解为in p or ( in ) w 吧
A： may be和likely重复登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这里不是平行结构把？in （A） ad （B） 和 in A and in B 意思上没有差别，而且前者更简洁，不是吗？
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
从答案来看应该是没有的。还以为might是过去式 排除了。。。
might像是种虚拟语气，意思是如果在其他程序里或采访里，不会只话费1个小时，但这个其他程序和采访是个与现在情况相反的情形（我现在用的是Rorschach test而不是另外两种）与现在情况相反的虚拟语气结构：if did，then would /could/should/might
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E。likely not to emerge我觉得好像不能作为一个排除点，E的错误点应该是在interviewing的形式应该使用名词形式去掉ing。
b whose不能修饰process；emerge 动词形式>名词形式，后面or前后平行同上。
c correct
d emerge in固定搭配？or前后平行同a
语意；介词；去掉介词对语意的影响；or 平行
错选d两次。emerge 出现；emerge in 而不是under-况且，d中并列后under weeks明显也是不对的，所以or前后应该标明介词in
前： might may都可以，不用过度纠结
语意；去掉介词对语意的影响；or 平行
错选d两次。emerge 出现；emerge in 而不是under-况且，d中并列后under weeks明显也是不对的，所以or前后应该标明介词in
前： might may都可以，不用过度纠结
B，同样还是平行问题
D，平行问题，同时under有点奇怪
E，likely not使用错误