扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-SC-23
When bitter managerial conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to turn to outside professional counselors to help resolve disagreement.
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that might have in the past led to its dissolution, executives likely will
conflicts plague a small company, which in the past it might have led to the business’s dissolution,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to its dissolution, plague a small company, executives tend to
E选项中its无指代
借这问题在说一下非限制性定语从句和限制性定语从句
假设E选项变为：conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company, executives are likely to
同样选A，不是因为E错，而是因为A更好。which引导的非限定从是对先行词的附加说明，去掉不会影响主句的意思，但是这里明显不能去掉，正是因为conflicts that might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company，才能使得后面的主句更有说服力，即executives are likely to turn to outside professional counsellors to help resolve disagreement
错选了D，GMAT其实很多这样的二选一，一个非限制定语从句，一个同位语，我遇到的都选择了同位语，大概率是因为非限制定语从句可以删去，不会影响意思的理解，但是这道题明显不可以删去，要强调什么样的矛盾
对对，which后面是 nonessential clause可以删去，但前提是不改变句子中的本意
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
be liable to do 有做某事的倾向，后面通常是不好的事情，liable通常是指法律上或者义务上的那种倾向；
be likely to do 很可能做某事，用法更general一些
能问下e为什么不对吗
E选项中its无指代
借这问题在说一下非限制性定语从句和限制性定语从句
假设E选项变为：conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company, executives are likely to
同样选A，不是因为E错，而是因为A更好。which引导的非限定从是对先行词的附加说明，去掉不会影响主句的意思，但是这里明显不能去掉，正是因为conflicts that might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company，才能使得后面的主句更有说服力，即executives are likely to turn to outside professional counsellors to help resolve disagreement
感谢回复！！！ 你太厉害了
客气哈~我是菜逼，大佬太多了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Liable is sometimes used informally as a synonym of likely, but in formal written English, it is typically used only where the potential outcome is undesirable.
看来同位语不一定紧跟先行词，我真是不知道被哪里的“同位语一定紧跟先行词所以排除”注释给误导了，我不懂SC的这种考点到底要让non native speaker怎么学，怎么搞。搞死人
D：when引导的从句头重脚轻，这是英文书面表达中相当忌讳的，这也是it is adj to do 被创造出来的原因
D. The phrase the business is inappropriate given that no business has, by this point, been mentioned. The verb plague is too far removed from its subject conflicts, making the sentence awkward and difficult to read.
Liable is sometimes used informally as a synonym of likely, but in formal written English, it is typically used only where the potential outcome is undesirable.
Liable is sometimes used informally as a synonym of likely, but
in formal written English, it is typically used only where the potential
outcome is undesirable. In this sentence, likelyis rhetorically a better
choice.
executives 有可能去找consultant，并非 有义务去找consultant
D ，which非限制性定语从句(整体概念)，表示所有bitter managerial conflicts都具有后述性质， 而激烈的管理冲突不可能只有这一种，不符合逻辑，不对； A 同位语that限制性从句，表明是bitter managerial conflicts中具有后述性质的那种conflicts，符合逻辑，正确
之前以为A 里面 conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business 是个句子，结果好像是个长修饰语，修饰conflicts的？
are likely to ;are liable to 不是考点 考点是主干和修饰句子 逻辑结构 排除DE
be likely to do 排除B
C的which 修饰不对
D 错在be liable to是易于做，而不是可能做
be liable to 是有“有可能做……，有……倾向”的意思的 ：（
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
its 就算指代到company，逻辑也是错误的。既然之前公司都解散了，那么之后就不会有conflicts了，所以只能是商业的解散。
谢谢！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
第一个没啥硬伤；第二个的选项非常混乱，in the past, likely will都很诡异，宁选A也不选这个；CWhich的指代有错；D选项插入语，而且are liable to 非常诡异，没有这种用法，选A也不选这个；E的Its指代不清晰，而且也存在诡异插入语的问题，所以不选
一个非限制定语从句，一个同位语，一般遇到的都选择了同位语，大概率是因为非限制定语从句可以删去，不会影响意思的理解，但是这道题明显不可以删去，要强调什么样的矛盾
sc
二选一，排除d
D：when引导的从句头重脚轻，这是英文书面表达中相当忌讳的，这也是it is adj to do 被创造出来的原因
m
Liable 'as per custom' is used only to denote some bad things. It is not used in such cases as when somebody turns to some normal course in the ordinary of business of life. First dump C and D. In E, the pronoun 'its' has no antecedent. A and B use correctly the appositive 'conflicts' to pinpoint the possible damage by the feuds and therefore are the contenders. B uses both 'when' and likely will' for a simultaneous occurrence of the cause and effect.
！！！！ 重复 不简洁是最后用于排除的标准 先排除语义结构语法有明显错误 不能忍受的选项