In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles such as those once followed by southern Africa’s Bushmen and Australia’s Aboriginal people, requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seem inevitably doomed.
requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seem inevitably doomed
requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seems to be inevitably doomed
which require vast wild spaces and permit little accumulation of goods, seem to be inevitably doomed
lifestyles that require vast wild spaces and permit little accumulation of goods, seem inevitable
lifestyles requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seems inevitable
comma+V-ing是状语,主语是disappearance,语义错误,排除B。
另外要注意inevitably doomed是冗余,不能放在一起用。
1. 单复数一致
2. inevitably = doomed,语义重复
3. 排比句,结构一致。those (lifestyles) followed by..., , lifestyles requiring...。如果不加lifestyles的话,v-ing的performer有变成people的嫌疑(就近找动作的执行者)。
seem inevitable与disappearance of lifestyles 相接,表示这种生活习惯的消失是无法避免的
主要根据语义进行判断 requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods 到底主语是谁 ,
消失不可避免,那么to be doomed 注定失败 则不用说
E:独立主格,主句主语disappearance,从句require的主句应该是lifestyles。整体的主句就是主句的主语,即disappearance,用seems。
通过Seem直接排除了ACD,剩下B和E;对比发现,BE有两处差别,第一Lifestyles的出现非常诡异,为何需要在这里重复Lifestyle,此时就要小心了,可能有坑,时间允许就再分析一下,有怀疑却没有留个心眼!!!!直接排除了!!!沙雕。。。。。。。
你太好笑了🤣
我觉得自己也像一只沙雕……登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
2.主谓一致,单数主语,排除ACD
Requiring 的主语应该是disappearance,但是这个主语结合此处的句意就变了,这里是说那些lifestyle的要求,所以B错误
前面disappearance是核心词,所以后面的谓语动词用第三人称单数seems,ACD错误
B和E的本质区别是disappearance seems inevitably doomed 还是disappearance seems inevitable? 显然题目想要表达的意思是lifestyles是doomed而disappearance是 inevitable