扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-SC-26
A natural response of communities devastated by earthquake or flood is to rebuild on the same site, overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated.
overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated
overlooking the possibility that the forces causing it could be repeated
overlooking that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one
without considering that the forces causing the disaster could be repeated
without considering that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another such disaster
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
Advanced的题目真心在提示我们，虽然看起来很废话的选项，未必是错的。
这个题有意思就有意思在句意表达是否能够完整。原句意思其实很容易看出来是：对于地震或洪水造成的灾害的天然反应就是在原地重建，但是这种反应没考虑到（在原地）会再次发生灾害的可能性。
A/B it 指代不明，根据句意得出这里应该是disaster；但是考虑到代词指代经常bug,所以这里最致命的问题在于：
A： forces....could be repeated
B: forces...could be repeated
明显句意错误，所以要排除修饰来看，这两处才是要命的
同理排除D
C; forces could also cause another one...another one what?
E：修正了another one带来的歧义，虽然看起来很啰嗦但是句意清晰
请问，possibility和could会不会redundant
不会
会，这里正确的话要用will不能用could
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论