Judge Lois Forer’s study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed between
do some litigants have a preferred status over another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
some litigants have a preferred status to another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact not equally distributed between
does one litigant have a preferred status over the other in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact they are not equally distributed among
→idioms: between…and, not among, 排除a/c/e
→why+肯定句,这里没有问号,不需要do/does,排除a/c/e
→prefer: 这里表达的不是prefer A to B, 而是sb have a preferred status over others. 一些人比另外一些人在形式上更有优势。排除d
→comma+adj不能直接修饰名词,要用which从句。排除c/d/e
comma+adj不能直接修饰名词,那如果少掉comma才是修饰名词对吧?
少了comma,adj一般放在名词前修饰
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论