Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel, ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than in 1960.
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute as
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than it did
and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
and wood now costs eight times as much as a result to collect and distribute than
B错在resulting in wood,这个表达有歧义,now costing eight times as much to collect是修饰wood的,在GMAT中,这种修饰需要拿掉再去看,如果拿掉的话,句子就直接变成了resulting in wood,无意义。
B:直接导致wood有问题。
前后两句话是有因果关系的,因此在一开始考虑的时候,我优先把后者降为状语,表示前者的一个结果。如果D没有“ as a result”,而仅仅表示并列,那意思就差很多了,有了这个词组,给两句话套上了一个因果联系,而不是单纯的并列关系。
语法点:倍数的表达 xxx times as much as,排除选项1,3,5.
A now costs eight times as much to do as it (=A) did in 1960.
莫名其妙关注在了逗号上而排除了正确选项!!!查了一下这也是个语法点。
“當 and 連接的是兩個句子時 (後面的句子也有自己的主詞), and 前面必須加逗點。即使後面句子的主詞和前面句子的主詞是同樣的人或物。只要後面句子有自己的主詞, 就該在 and 前加逗點。“
不是wood本身導致 而是整件事
跟
不是在比較年代 是在比較年代裡的動作
※ 倍数的表达:# times as much as(√);# times as much...than(×)。--- 排除ACE
※ resulting in+wood.....导致了木头....即语义在wood这个[名词n.]--- 排除B。
除非名词n.可以表示核心语义,比如改成resulting in the increasing of wood cost......(√)
※根据原来句子的语义:应该是 导致了木头价格更高【这件事】,应该用并列句(,and as a result +句子)。--选E(√)
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel, ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did in 1960.
由于 70% 的印度人使用木材作为唯一燃料,因此自 1960 年以来,那里已经失去了 1000 万英亩的森林, 因此现在收集和分发木材的成本是 1960 年的八倍。
表原因or结果:语义重心应该在【一件事】,而不是名词。
because+句子、 and as a result.+句子:语义重心放在一件事
result in+n.+doing结构、because of+n.+doing结构:语义重心放在名词n.
对【某件事】有信心,而不是对某个对象有信心:
have confidence 【that+同位语从句】:语义重心在这件事(√);
have confidence in+n.,语义重心在名词(×)
表明、建议【某件事】,而不是某个对象:
indicate、suggest+宾语从句:语义重心在【这件事】(突出内容)(√);
indicate、suggest一般不加介词+名词,因为想表达的是一件事,而不是某个对象
A B C里边,resulting in wood ....是状语,主语是forest,语义错误。
E里边应该是 x times as ... as...,不能用than;而且as a result放的位置诡异。
D里的it指代wood,是指木头这个物品类别,而不是同一批木头
拿掉修饰B毫无意义
b选项:resulting in wood ,逻辑语义错误
拿开修饰看!!!!
compariosn AS must be used in a clause, while preposition AS must be used with a noun or noun phrase. Therefore, AS IN 1960 cannot express comparison.
注意把修饰拿开看!!!
b选项:resulting in wood ,逻辑语义错误
b选项:resulting in wood ,逻辑语义错误。
D项:This clearly expresses the consequence that the loss of forest has increased prices of wood
B项为啥不对,resulting in... 作状语修饰前句有问题吗?
ABC和DE逻辑意思是有区别的,DE是因为人们使用wood作为sole fuel,导致了后面两件事(并列);而ABC是因为人们使用wood作为sole fuel,导致了后面一件事,同时wood 价格更高作为状语修饰这件事,这个逻辑显然是不如前者合理
the correct comparison as much . . . as.
Problem with B - resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute as in 1960 ----wrong comparison.
请问B in 1960 不能和now平行吗,和D的区别是在哪呢
B的平行是对的。B错在resulting in wood,这个表达有歧义,now costing eight times as much to collect是修饰wood的,在GMAT中,这种修饰需要拿掉再去看,如果拿掉的话,句子就直接变成了resulting in wood,无意义。
同意!赞!
谢谢你
同意!谢谢大佬!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论