A new beverage company has been operating in two cities, one in City A and the other in City B. The company has stocked shelves equally in supermarkets in both cities, but has stocked twice as many shelves in UDS (up and down the street) stores in City A as in City B. The two cities have similar populations and economics and the sales at each store have been roughly equal. A consultant claims this shows that stocking shelves in UDS stores has not improved beverage sales.
In the table, select changes that the company could make in City A and City B, respectively, that together would probably be most helpful in testing the consultant's claim. Make only two selections, one in each column.
City A | City B | |
---|---|---|
|
|
Double shelf space allotted to the beverage company in supermarkets
|
|
|
Eliminate its presence in supermarkets
|
|
|
Eliminate its presence in UDS stores.
|
|
|
Selectively choose only the largest UDS stores to have a presence in
|
|
|
Add beverage shelf space in gas stations and discount
|
按照答案来解释:问UDS是否能促进销量,目前两个城市销量一样的。那么我把UDS从两个城市都拿掉看看。此时两个城市供货量完全一致的,如果此时两个城市最终的销量产生了差异(比如说B比A高),那么就证明之前在A city的UDS放2倍的库存,其实是促进了A city的销量。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论