Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training.
even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations.
many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations.
after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth .
even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth.
为什么不是E呢?没有环保规定依旧有经济增长,反驳了环保规定推出经济增长呀。虽然我也理解A选项
因为E选项,是strength argument。正是因为有环境监管对经济增长的助力,所以较弱的环境监管,能够带来一定的经济增长
e 问题是,严格的管理制度和宽松的制度下经济都能增长,如果宽松的增长了一点点,严格的增长了一大些,correlation分析的话,还是促进,并没有如文章最后所言,起了削弱作用。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论