扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-102
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training.
even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations.
many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations.
after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth .
even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth.
首先，弄清楚结论——环保条例的严格并不能促进经济发展
需要削弱的论据——一些省因为环保条例严格所以经济发展得很好
错误选项E——环保条例很弱的省依然会有小幅度的经济增长，注意这个是小幅度，所以不能反驳——可能环保条例加强就会使经济进一步加强呢？只有说环保条例弱的省经济发展依然很好才能说明条例的严格和经济发展没有关系。
正确选项A——其实是他因削弱，环保条例严格的省之所以经济发展使因为教育和培训的支出很多。是这些被教育的人增加了经济。
迷惑项C—— nonsense！这是一个常见的错误项。这个选项可以约等于这样的说法：因为一些专家认为环保条例的严格不影响经济发展。这种说法完全是一个无关选项，这些省考虑放宽政策，但是没有说他们是为了增强经济，其次——就算是为了增强经济，但是上下文不符合——这些省的事例并不能说明环保条例的严格促进了经济发展，因为许多经济衰退的省在考虑让环保条例宽松。这个考虑，只是一个想法——不是客观事实——缺乏说服力。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论