扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-21
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
结论是：Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.已经有上百万的人把钱存进了特殊账户，所以政府的计划确实鼓励到储蓄。
问题：哪个说明政府的计划并没有鼓励储蓄。
D，Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.很多已有长期储蓄账户的人把账户里的钱转到了特殊账户。所以，特殊账户里有很多钱并不表示政府的政策鼓励了储蓄率的增加。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论