扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-21
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
A为什么不行？很多的人存了钱却半途而废了，所以计划并没有取得成功
我的理解： A和计划无关。这题果：Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts 因： 计划的实施。削弱是因为这个计划成功的原因。去找他因。D，因为只是钱从一个账户转到另一个，所以并不是计划的成功带来的原因 （可以说明） A，中途取钱，这个无关。因为有没有取钱，都有大量钱在special accounts，这不能说明计划没有成功。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论