Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission of these "greenhouse" gases contributes to global warming. In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.
Objection: The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.
Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?
Every time a human being or other mammal exhales, there is some carbon dioxide released into the air.
The conversion of methane to electricity would occur at a considerable distance from the landfills.
The methane that is used to generate electricity would generally be used as a substitute for a fuel that does not produce any greenhouse gases when burned.
Methane in the atmosphere is more effective in blocking the escape of heat from the Earth than is carbon dioxide.
The amount of methane emitted from the landfills could be reduced if the materials whose decomposition produces methane were not discarded, but recycled.
more effective???in bloking??那不就是比二氧化碳更阻止地球散热吗? 这句话到底怎么理解?
Proposal: 我们应该通过燃烧的方式让甲烷转化成电力
Objection: 这种燃烧转换的方式会产生CO2
问: 哪一种counter objection,就等于问哪一种支持proposal
D选项:甲烷会更有效的阻止热量散发(加重温室效应),所以我们应该通过燃烧的方式把它转化成电力,尽管这个过程会产生CO2,产生的CO2对温室效应的影响还是要小于甲烷对其的影响。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论