Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province's sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds' spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency's approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
每一年一种鸟在迁徙过程中会吃掉许多粮食,当地人们决定用一种毒米,减少这种吃粮食的鸟类,但是反对者说这可能会威胁到一些珍贵的鸟类。然而,当地的野生保护协会竟然同意用毒米的做法。问如何支持野生动物保护协会?
即这种不会杀死珍贵的鸟类即可,A正确。B项说这种毒米不会杀死鸟类,但是会使鸟类吃完以后不能产卵。错误:这样还是不能反驳反对者,因为如果珍贵鸟类吃了毒米,也会受到威胁,数量以后也会减少。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论