Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province's sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds' spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency's approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
【错选C:migratory birds和native birds没注意】
---by ruqi
每年秋天blackbird路过村庄都会破坏粮食,农民准备用毒药杀死一部分鸟保护庄稼。尽管一些人担心农药会杀死另外一些候鸟,村里最后还是批准用药。问explain
choice a, 在这种blackbird每年春天落脚的地方,这些鸟是第一批到达的候鸟。correct,说明这些鸟可以在其他候鸟来之前把毒药给吃完。
choice c, 因为大米不是本地生产的,很少有本地的鸟会去吃米。irrelevant,讨论的scope是会不会对其他候鸟造成伤害,和本地鸟无关
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论