Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province's sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds' spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency's approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
题目本质是削弱:有毒米饭会威胁稀有鸟
逻辑链分析:
投放有毒米饭1→迁移的黑鸟会减少2→同样迁移的稀有鸟也会减少3
隐含假设:迁移的鸟会吃到有毒米饭
A说明黑鸟最先达到,因此有毒米饭会被黑鸟吃掉,也就不会被后到达的稀有鸟吃到。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论