Which of following most logically completes the argument?
The last members of a now-extinct species of a European wild deer called the giant dear lived in Ireland about 16,000 years ago. Prehistoric cave paintings in France depict this animal as having a large hump on its back. Fossils of this animal, however, do not show any hump. Nevertheless, there is no reason to conclude that the cave paintings are therefore inaccurate in this regard, since ______.
some prehistoric cave paintings in France also depict other animals as having a hump
fossils of the giant deer are much more common in Ireland than in France
animal humps are composed of fatty tissue, which dose not fossilize
the cave paintings of the giant deer were painted well before 16,000 years ago
only one currently existing species of deer has any anatomical feature that even remotely resembles a hump
C很绝啊,堵死了所有否定壁画不对的可能性-----驼峰压根儿就不能形成化石
which dose not fossilize:不应该错,直接说明了hump不能化石化
错选D
仔细想一下,就算这画是16000年以前画的(早于最后一只鹿死),也并不能证明这画就是准确的
只有说明 画是准确的,但是为什么fossil没有角,但是画是有角的才可以弥补gap
没有出现驼峰,并不代表这个动物没有驼峰(即画不准确),弥补gap
赞!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
assumption :gap弥补,说明没有fossil的原因。