People with a certain eye disorder are virtually unable to see in moderately bright light, which seems to them unbearably intense, since the cells of their retinas are overwhelmed by moderately bright light. These people do, however, show normal sensitivity to most components of dim light. Their retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light.
The information above best supports which of the following hypotheses about people with the disorder described, if they have no other serious visual problems?
In all moderately dim light in which people without the disorder can read large print, people with the disorder cannot read such print.
In an otherwise darkened concert hall, these people will see a dimly illuminated red exit sign more clearly than small dim white lights that mark the aisles.
These people typically see more acutely at night and in dim light than do most people who do not have the disorder.
Eyeglasses that are transparent to red components of light but filter out other components of light help these people see in moderately bright light.
These people perceive colors other than red in the same way as do most people who do not have the disorder.
因为模考没时间所以错了。
excessively 过分地,极度地
cells of their retinas are overwhelmed by moderately bright light 也就是过度sensitive了
Their retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light:excessively过度敏感了是不好的,另外also也说明和前一句dim light里能看清逻辑层面相同,即这些患者正常的部分,所以对红色是正常反应,我理解反了
---by ruqi
一些有眼部疾病的人 1)没法忍受正常亮度的光,2)可以忍受暗光。但这些人可以看清楚正常亮度的红光。问must be true
choice b, 在一个昏暗的音乐厅内,这些人看暗淡的红光会比看暗淡的白光更清楚。incorrect,这些人对于暗光的感知度都是一样的
choice d, 只通过红光,过滤掉其他颜色光的眼镜可以帮助这些人在正常光亮度下看清楚。correct
其他选项中的large print和most people who do not have the disorder都是未出现的新事物。
演绎推理
eye disorder患者受不了日常强光,视网膜受不了;对日常暗光不敏感,视网膜可以接受日常强光中的red components
B 选项混淆了成分 dim red light 不是题目中的dim light+ bright light red components
B more clearly错误
not excessively sensitive to red
一些有眼部疾病的人 1)没法忍受正常亮度的光,2)可以忍受暗光。但这些人可以看清楚正常亮度的红光。问must be true
choice b, 在一个昏暗的音乐厅内,这些人看暗淡的红光会比看暗淡的白光更清楚。incorrect,这些人对于暗光的感知度都是一样的
choice d, 只通过红光,过滤掉其他颜色光的眼镜可以帮助这些人在正常光亮度下看清楚。correct
unbearably intense, since the cells of their retinas are overwhelmed by moderately bright light.
过度紧张,对bright light
没看懂这句话
Their retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light.
这种细胞并不对red过度敏感,
excessively
过分,极度(不好的)
intense
强烈紧张
选项B:比较的是 dim red light 和dim bright light,但是这些人对于微光的视力都是一样的
眼睛有某种疾病的人无法在正常光中看见东西,然而这些人在微光中可以看见大多数东西,并且他们对正常光中的红色不会过分敏感
第二遍做对了 时间把握好哦
有点像数学题,根据原文提供的条件:1 眼疾患者对中等强度的亮光敏感 2 他们对暗淡的光线敏感度一般(可接受) 3 对红色中等强度的亮光接受度也还可以 =====问哪个结论可以由这些信息推出----只有D可以依靠原文信息推出
“heir retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light.” 就是normal sensitivity
就是他们对红光跟对dim light 一样 不过分敏感,就是可以识别
“heir retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light.” 就是normal sensitivity
就是他们对红光跟对dim light 一样 不过分敏感,就是可以识别
还是感觉gwd的题没有prep正
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-70749-3-1.html
没有仔细的读C
...而且在读题目陈述的时候: Their retinal cells are also not excessively sensitive to red components of moderately bright light.
没有很快的理解它想表达的含义倾向。注意:also/not/excessively
are also not excessively sensitive to red 对正常光照下的红光不会过分敏感 所以d对
show normal sensitivity 因为是normal 所以并不会比普通人看得更清楚 c错
?什么推理